McBride W G, Black B P, Brown C J, Dolby R M, Murray A D, Thomas D B
Med J Aust. 1979 Apr 21;1(8):301-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1979.tb112116.x.
A controlled follow-up study examined the impact of delivery method on developmental outcome of the child. The modes of delivery investigated were low forceps delivery (188 infants), midcavity forceps delivery (51 infants), forceps rotation with forceps delivery (57 infants), manual rotation with forceps delivery (67 infants), elective caesarean section (101 infants) and spontaneous delivery (control, 207 infants). Breech presentation (100 infants) was separately compared with the vertex presentation groups. Sample selection controlled for complications during pregnancy and low birthweight and was restricted to married English-speaking mothers. The children were assessed at the age of five years on verbal and non-verbal subtests of a standardized intelligence scale, tests of gross motor coordination, and auditory and visual tests. A full paediatric examination was also performed. Breech presentation children performed less well on tests of balance and fine motor coordination and on visual acuity and stereopsis testing than children who presented in the vertex position. No deleterious effect of delivery method was found. In the absence of other complicating events (like a poor antenatal history, prematurity, and a disorganized home environment) delivery complication constitutes an early risk factor which the growing child is able to overcome.
一项对照随访研究考察了分娩方式对儿童发育结局的影响。所研究的分娩方式包括低位产钳分娩(188例婴儿)、中位产钳分娩(51例婴儿)、产钳旋转加产钳分娩(57例婴儿)、手法旋转加产钳分娩(67例婴儿)、择期剖宫产(101例婴儿)和自然分娩(对照组,207例婴儿)。臀位分娩(100例婴儿)与头位分娩组分别进行比较。样本选择控制了孕期并发症和低出生体重,并限于已婚说英语的母亲。在儿童5岁时,对其进行标准化智力量表的语言和非语言子测试、大运动协调测试以及听觉和视觉测试评估。还进行了全面的儿科检查。与头位分娩的儿童相比,臀位分娩的儿童在平衡和精细运动协调测试以及视力和立体视觉测试中的表现较差。未发现分娩方式有有害影响。在没有其他复杂事件(如不良的产前病史、早产和混乱的家庭环境)的情况下,分娩并发症是一个早期风险因素,但成长中的儿童能够克服。