Suppr超能文献

不进行宫颈管搔刮术的阴道镜检查准确性评估。

Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy without endocervical curettage.

作者信息

Swan R W

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun;53(6):680-4.

PMID:450334
Abstract

A study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of colposcopic examination when performed without the use of endocervical curettage. It included 763 cases of suspected cervical-vaginal pathology. An additional evaluation of colposcopic accuracy was made for special-case categories of 1) stromal invasion, 2) pregnancy, 3) menopause, and 4) diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. Colposcopic accuracy was determined by cytologic and histologic material obtained either at the initial colposcopic evaluation or during follow-up surgery. With the literature as a standard for accuracy, it was concluded that the omission of endocervical curettage from the colposcopic examination did not reduce accuracy. In addition, the diagnostic conization rate was lower than in most reported series. Finally, the rate of missed invasive lesions was not increased by the omission of endocervical curettage.

摘要

一项研究旨在评估在不进行宫颈管搔刮术的情况下进行阴道镜检查的准确性。该研究纳入了763例疑似宫颈-阴道病变的病例。还对以下特殊病例类别进行了阴道镜检查准确性的额外评估:1)间质浸润,2)妊娠,3)绝经,以及4)己烯雌酚(DES)暴露。阴道镜检查的准确性通过在初次阴道镜评估时或随访手术期间获取的细胞学和组织学材料来确定。以文献中的准确性标准为依据,得出的结论是,在阴道镜检查中省略宫颈管搔刮术不会降低准确性。此外,诊断性锥切率低于大多数报道系列。最后,省略宫颈管搔刮术不会增加漏诊浸润性病变的发生率。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验