• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆骨折患者腹膜腔灌洗的诊断错误。

Diagnostic errors with peritoneal lavage in patients with pelvic fractures.

作者信息

Hubbard S G, Bivins B A, Sachatello C R, Griffen W O

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1979 Jul;114(7):844-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370310086015.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370310086015
PMID:454178
Abstract

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage, considered to be a highly accurate, technique for detecting intraperitoneal blood in the trauma patient, may be less reliable in the presence of a pelvic fracture. In a retrospective review of 222 patients with pelvic fractures, 61 patients were found who had had a diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed as part of the initial evaluation of their condition. Twenty-six of these patients had had a negative lavage result negative lavage result. There had been no false-negative results in this group, although six patients required operations for extraperitoneal injuries. Of the 35 patients with a positive lavage results, 10 (29%) were found to have false-positive lavage results with no intraperitoneal source of bleeding. The only deaths in this series occurred in the group requiring operations, eight of 41 (20%). Four of the eight detahs were due to uncontrollable bleeding that resulted from exploration of the retroperitoneal hematoma. These data suggest that a negative lavage result is highly reliable in the patient with a pelvic fracture and should allow management with confidence that there is no severe intraperitoneal injury. Positive lavage results, however, must be interpreted with caution.

摘要

诊断性腹腔灌洗被认为是检测创伤患者腹腔内出血的一种高度准确的技术,但在存在骨盆骨折的情况下可能不太可靠。在一项对222例骨盆骨折患者的回顾性研究中,发现有61例患者在初始病情评估时进行了诊断性腹腔灌洗。其中26例患者灌洗结果为阴性。该组中没有假阴性结果,尽管有6例患者因腹膜外损伤需要手术。在35例灌洗结果为阳性的患者中,有10例(29%)被发现灌洗结果为假阳性,腹腔内并无出血源。该系列中仅有的死亡病例发生在需要手术的组中,41例中有8例(20%)。8例死亡中有4例是由于探查腹膜后血肿导致无法控制的出血。这些数据表明,灌洗结果为阴性在骨盆骨折患者中高度可靠,并且可以放心地进行处理,因为不存在严重的腹腔内损伤。然而,灌洗结果为阳性时必须谨慎解读。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic errors with peritoneal lavage in patients with pelvic fractures.骨盆骨折患者腹膜腔灌洗的诊断错误。
Arch Surg. 1979 Jul;114(7):844-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370310086015.
2
False positive peritoneal lavage due to retroperitoneal haematoma.腹膜后血肿导致的腹腔灌洗假阳性
Injury. 1980 Nov;12(3):191-3. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(80)90005-4.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of peritoneal lavage in patients with pelvic fractures.盆腔骨折患者腹腔灌洗的诊断准确性
Arch Surg. 1994 May;129(5):477-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420290023003.
4
Open versus closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage. A multiphasic prospective randomized comparison.开放式与闭合式诊断性腹腔灌洗:多阶段前瞻性随机对照比较
Ann Surg. 1984 Jul;200(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00004.
5
The use of peritoneal lavage and urological studies in major fractures of the pelvis--a reassessment.骨盆严重骨折中腹腔灌洗和泌尿外科检查的应用——重新评估
Injury. 1987 Nov;18(6):379-83. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(87)90282-8.
6
Peritoneal lavage and angiography in the management of patients with pelvic fractures.腹膜灌洗和血管造影在骨盆骨折患者治疗中的应用
Am J Surg. 1982 Dec;144(6):744-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90562-1.
7
[Abdominal injuries accompanying pelvic fractures].[骨盆骨折伴发的腹部损伤]
Unfallchirurgie. 1985 Feb;11(1):7-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02587921.
8
Abdominopelvic injury associated with pelvic fracture.与骨盆骨折相关的腹盆腔损伤。
JACEP. 1979 Aug;8(8):312-5. doi: 10.1016/s0361-1124(79)80371-8.
9
Technique for peritoneal lavage when a pelvic fracture and suspected hematoma are present.存在骨盆骨折并怀疑有血肿时的腹腔灌洗技术。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Sep;153(3):403-4.
10
[Indications for laparotomy after blunt abdominal trauma. The role of peritoneal lavage (author's transl)].钝性腹部创伤后剖腹手术的指征。腹腔灌洗的作用(作者译)
Unfallheilkunde. 1979 Aug;82(8):327-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic packing - status 2024.盆腔填塞——2024年状况
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jan 11;145(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05699-3.
2
How should we manage exsanguinating pelvic fractures in the United Kingdom?在英国,我们应该如何处理骨盆骨折大出血?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jan;15(1):2-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.1.2.
3
Open versus closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage. A multiphasic prospective randomized comparison.开放式与闭合式诊断性腹腔灌洗:多阶段前瞻性随机对照比较
Ann Surg. 1984 Jul;200(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00004.
4
[Injuries of the pelvis, its bones and soft tissues. b) Soft tissues of the pelvis].[骨盆及其骨骼和软组织损伤。b) 骨盆的软组织]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1983;361:185-239.
5
[Abdominal injuries accompanying pelvic fractures].[骨盆骨折伴发的腹部损伤]
Unfallchirurgie. 1985 Feb;11(1):7-11. doi: 10.1007/BF02587921.
6
Mini-laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤中的迷你腹腔镜检查
Surg Endosc. 1988;2(3):184-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02498797.
7
Management of traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma.创伤性腹膜后血肿的管理
Ann Surg. 1990 Feb;211(2):109-23. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199002000-00001.
8
The investigation of abdominal trauma.腹部创伤的研究
Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Mar;7(1):1-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.1.1.