Knutsson E, Richards C
Brain. 1979 Jun;102(2):405-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.2.405.
The pattern of muscle activation in walking was studied in a group of 26 hemiparetic patients. Electromyograms were taken with surface electrodes from 6 muscle groups of the paretic leg and analysed after rectification and time averaging. The sagittal rotations in hip, knee and ankle joint were determined with intermittent light photography. The muscle activation pattern of each patient was compared to that in healthy subjects as well as to the movements performed by the patient and to the normal movement pattern. The normal patterns of movement and muscle activation were assessed from compiled data from 10 healthy female volunteers and average values of angular displacements and amplitude of intergrated EMG were determined at each 5 per cent of the gait cycle. Change of muscle length was determined with a length recording transducer. Gait capacity varied highly in the group of patients studied and the movement pattern also varied markedly. Three types of abnormal muscle activation pattern were disclosed in the patients. In 9 patients, the calf muscles were prematurely activated in the stance phase, probably due to enhanced stretch reflexes (Type I). In another 9 patients, EMG activity was abolished or extremely low in 2 or more of the muscles examined (Type II). In 4 patients, there was a pathological coactivation of several or all of the muscles during part of the gait-cycle, thus disrupting the normal sequential shift of activity in antagonistic muscles (Type III). In the remaining 4 patients, the muscle activation pattern was more complex and no common pattern was discerned.
对一组26名偏瘫患者行走时的肌肉激活模式进行了研究。使用表面电极从患侧腿的6个肌肉群采集肌电图,并在整流和时间平均后进行分析。通过间歇光照摄影确定髋、膝和踝关节的矢状面旋转。将每位患者的肌肉激活模式与健康受试者的模式、患者自身的运动以及正常运动模式进行比较。根据10名健康女性志愿者的综合数据评估正常的运动和肌肉激活模式,并在步态周期的每5%处确定角位移和积分肌电图幅度的平均值。使用长度记录传感器确定肌肉长度的变化。在所研究的患者组中,步态能力差异很大,运动模式也明显不同。在患者中发现了三种异常的肌肉激活模式。9名患者在站立期小腿肌肉过早激活,可能是由于牵张反射增强(I型)。另外9名患者,在所检查的2块或更多肌肉中肌电图活动消失或极低(II型)。4名患者在步态周期的部分时间内几块或所有肌肉出现病理性共同激活,从而扰乱了拮抗肌活动的正常顺序转换(III型)。其余4名患者的肌肉激活模式更为复杂,未发现共同模式。