Brumfitt W, Pursell R
Br Med J. 1972 Jun 17;2(5815):673-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5815.673.
In order to test their value in urinary infection a double-blind trial was carried out using ampicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), and trimethoprim. Eighty-three courses of treatment were given to hospital patients, 149 to pregnant women, and 107 to patients with dysuria and frequency seen in domiciliary practice. Thus infections of varying severity in defined groups of patients caused by organisms with different antibiotic sensitivities were treated.Analysis of the overall results (339 courses) was compared with those from the individual groups and considerable variation in response was found. In domiciliary infections and bacteriuria in pregnancy trimethoprim alone proved to be at least as effective as the other three compounds and caused fewer than half the number of side effects. In the hospital patients co-trimoxazole was superior to trimethoprim.The overall results for ampicillin and cephalexin were similar although cephalexin proved to be inferior in treating symptomatic domiciliary infections.
为了测试氨苄西林、头孢氨苄、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(复方新诺明)和甲氧苄啶在泌尿系统感染中的价值,进行了一项双盲试验。对医院患者进行了83个疗程的治疗,对孕妇进行了149个疗程的治疗,对在家庭医疗中出现排尿困难和尿频的患者进行了107个疗程的治疗。因此,对由具有不同抗生素敏感性的微生物引起的特定患者群体中不同严重程度的感染进行了治疗。将总体结果(339个疗程)的分析与各个组的结果进行了比较,发现反应存在相当大的差异。在家庭感染和孕期菌尿中,单独使用甲氧苄啶被证明至少与其他三种化合物一样有效,且副作用不到其他三种化合物的一半。在医院患者中,复方新诺明优于甲氧苄啶。氨苄西林和头孢氨苄的总体结果相似,尽管头孢氨苄在治疗有症状的家庭感染方面被证明较差。