一项考试的演变：英国皇家内科医师学会会员资格考试
Evolution of an examination: M.R.C.P. (U.K.).
作者信息
Fleming P R, Manderson W G, Matthews M B, Sanderson P H, Stokes J F
出版信息
Br Med J. 1974 Apr 13;2(5910):99-107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5910.99.
Abstract
Recent changes in the structure of the examination for M.R.C.P. (U.K.) have prompted a review of these together with a historical outline of the examinations which preceded it at the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Edinburgh, Glasgow, and London.Part I of the examination continues to fulfil its role as a screen and a slight change in the marking system appears to have improved its discriminating powers still further. The major change in part II is the substitution of a more objective written test in place of the essay papers.
摘要
英国皇家内科医师资格考试（M.R.C.P.）结构的近期变化促使人们对其进行审视，并回顾爱丁堡、格拉斯哥和伦敦皇家内科医学院在此之前的考试历史概况。考试第一部分继续发挥其筛选作用，评分系统的细微变化似乎进一步提高了其甄别能力。第二部分的主要变化是用更客观的笔试取代了论文考试。
相似文献
1
Evolution of an examination: M.R.C.P. (U.K.).一项考试的演变：英国皇家内科医师学会会员资格考试
Br Med J. 1974 Apr 13;2(5910):99-107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5910.99.
2
The Royal College of Physicians of London.伦敦皇家内科医学院
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1974 Apr;8(3):193-205.
3
Membership by examination.通过考试获得会员资格。
Ulster Med J. 1995 Apr;64(1):72-84.
4
The Royal Colleges, the LDS and the struggles of the dental profession.皇家学院、LDS 与牙科行业的斗争。
Br Dent J. 2012 Sep;213(5):237-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.775.
5
Royal College of Physicians of London: a 1793 entrant, fabled fellow or member malcontent.伦敦皇家内科医师学院：1793 年的一名入会者，传说中的研究员或心怀不满的会员。
Intern Med J. 2019 Feb;49(2):265-268. doi: 10.1111/imj.14206.
6
The Royal College of Physicians of London: a short history.伦敦皇家内科医学院简史
Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Feb 17;120(4):486-8, 503.
7
Editorial: A brief history of the Royal College of Physicians of London.社论：伦敦皇家内科医学院简史
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1974 Apr;8(3):191-2.
8
The Royal College of Physicians of London 500th Anniversary.伦敦皇家内科医学院成立500周年。
Saudi Med J. 2018 Feb;39(2):121-123. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.2.22197.
9
Who would take our place?谁会取代我们的位置？
J Ky Med Assoc. 2002 Nov;100(11):481-4.
10
The final examination in United Kingdom medical schools, 1974.
Med Educ. 1976 Mar;10(2):109-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1976.tb00541.x.
引用本文的文献
1
"Development and Reliability of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for assessing clinical skills of audiology undergraduate students in Brazil".用于评估巴西听力学本科学生临床技能的客观结构化临床考试（OSCE）的开发与可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 5;25(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07029-6.
2
Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.药物治疗为基础的学习课程中临床文档评分标准的评定者间信度。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7648. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7648.
3
Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?临床评估中的评分者间信度： examiner pairings 是否会影响考生评分？
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 11;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02009-4.
4
Assessment methods and resource requirements for milestone reporting by an emergency medicine clinical competency committee.急诊医学临床能力委员会里程碑报告的评估方法和资源需求。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1538925. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1538925.
5
"On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.“在同一页上”？GP 考官反馈对临床评估中评分严重程度差异的影响：一项干预前后研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jun 6;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0929-9.
6
Exploration of a possible relationship between examiner stringency and personality factors in clinical assessments: a pilot study.临床评估中检查者严格程度与人格因素之间可能关系的探索：一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 31;14:1052. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0280-3.
7
Implementing statistical equating for MRCP(UK) Parts 1 and 2.为英国皇家内科医学院会员考试第1部分和第2部分实施统计等值法。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 26;14:204. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-204.
8
A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.评估学生报告的标准化评分细则。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Nov 10;74(9):171. doi: 10.5688/aj7409171.
9
Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.使用多维度Rasch模型评估英国皇家内科医师学会临床考试（PACES）中主考官的宽松和严格程度（“鹰鸽效应”）。
BMC Med Educ. 2006 Aug 18;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-42.
10
Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.使用客观结构化考试评估临床能力。
Br Med J. 1975 Feb 22;1(5955):447-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447.
本文引用的文献
1
An examination of the final examination in medicine.
Lancet. 1956 Aug 25;271(6939):368-72. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)91011-x.
Zotero 插件