• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[支气管细胞学——各种诊断原发性肺癌方法的价值。对送往圣加仑州立医院病理研究所细胞学实验室的材料进行的统计分析]

[Bronchial cytology--value of various methods for the diagnosis of primary lung neoplasms. A computation of the materials sent in to the cytological laboratory of the Institute of Pathology, Kantonspital, St. Gallen].

作者信息

Spieler P, Joder P

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Jun 2;109(22):824-7.

PMID:462151
Abstract

During the period 1973-1977 some 6100 sputum cytologies from 3000 patients were performed. All patients had suspected primary bronchogenic carcinoma. Sputum cytology was diagnostic in 547 patients (18%). A synopsis of all patients with proven lung cancer and at least one primary sputum cytology shows that this method was diagnostic in 80%. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with its associated procedures (biopsies, brushings, washings) was the most frequently performed endoscopic method at our Department of Medicine. Fiberbronchoscopy used in combination with cytologic brushings was diagnostic in 83% of the proven cancers. Formerly, bronchial washings and bronchial secretions were obtained by means of rigid bronchoscope. This material yielded the lowest percentage (51%) of all cytological methods used at the Cantonal Hospital. The indications for use of the different diagnostic methods mentioned above and important factors which yield a high percentage of positive cytologies are discussed.

摘要

在1973年至1977年期间,对3000名患者进行了约6100次痰细胞学检查。所有患者均怀疑患有原发性支气管癌。痰细胞学检查确诊了547例患者(18%)。对所有经证实患有肺癌且至少进行过一次原发性痰细胞学检查的患者的综述表明,该方法的诊断率为80%。纤维支气管镜检查及其相关操作(活检、刷检、冲洗)是我们医学部最常进行的内镜检查方法。纤维支气管镜检查联合细胞学刷检对83%的经证实的癌症具有诊断价值。以前,支气管冲洗液和支气管分泌物是通过硬支气管镜获取的。该材料在州立医院使用的所有细胞学检查方法中阳性率最低(51%)。本文讨论了上述不同诊断方法的使用指征以及产生高阳性细胞学率的重要因素。

相似文献

1
[Bronchial cytology--value of various methods for the diagnosis of primary lung neoplasms. A computation of the materials sent in to the cytological laboratory of the Institute of Pathology, Kantonspital, St. Gallen].[支气管细胞学——各种诊断原发性肺癌方法的价值。对送往圣加仑州立医院病理研究所细胞学实验室的材料进行的统计分析]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1979 Jun 2;109(22):824-7.
2
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer comparison of pre-and post-bronchoscopy sputa, washings, bruchings and biopsies.纤维支气管镜检查在肺癌诊断中的应用:支气管镜检查前后痰液、冲洗液、刷片及活检的比较
Acta Cytol. 1977 Jul-Aug;21(4):524-7.
3
Cytological survey of bronchial brushings and aspirations performed during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Arch Geschwulstforsch. 1978;48(3):245-9.
4
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Comparison of procedures used in the diagnosis of lung cancer.纤维支气管镜检查。肺癌诊断中所用检查方法的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978 Jul;76(1):33-7.
5
Bronchial brushing during fiberoptic bronchoscopy for the cytodiagnosis of lung cancer: comparison with sputum and bronchial washings.纤维支气管镜检查时支气管刷检用于肺癌细胞诊断:与痰液及支气管冲洗液的比较
Acta Cytol. 1976 Sep-Oct;20(5):446-53.
6
Fine needle aspiration biopsy versus sputum and bronchial material in the diagnosis of lung cancer. A comparative study of 168 patients.细针穿刺活检与痰液及支气管材料在肺癌诊断中的应用。168例患者的对比研究。
Acta Cytol. 1988 Sep-Oct;32(5):641-6.
7
Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma.经支气管针吸活检术在支气管源性癌诊断中的应用
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Aug;82(8):765-9.
8
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in diagnosis of opportunistic lung infections: assessment of Sputa, Washings, Brushings and biopsy specimens.纤维支气管镜检查在机会性肺部感染诊断中的应用:痰液、灌洗液、刷检物及活检标本的评估
West J Med. 1979 Jul;131(1):4-7.
9
Value of sputum cytology in the diagnosis and typing of bronchogenic carcinomas, excluding adenocarcinomas.痰细胞学检查在支气管源性癌(不包括腺癌)诊断及分型中的价值
Acta Cytol. 1982 Sep-Oct;26(5):645-8.
10
[Bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary foci].[周围型肺部病灶的支气管镜诊断]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006 Oct 6;131(40):2229-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-951358.