Johnson D A
Br Med J. 1973 Apr 7;2(5857):18-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5857.18.
With the co-operation of the family doctors in five selected urban general practices the general-practitioner treatment of 73 patients suffering from a new episode of depressive illness was evaluated over a period of four months. The purpose was to test the belief that general practitioners are best fitted to manage most psychological ailments, and depression was chosen as the psychiatric illness most commonly seen in general practice. Medication was the principal treatment offered, and this was often inadequate in dosage or the patient defaulted. Drug defaulting was thought to be due partly to failure of supervision and follow-up and to too low a consultation rate. The low consultation rate was also thought to explain why few patients thought there was a therapeutic value in the doctor-patient relationship. The results of the study indicate that patients with depressive illness do not receive the best treatment in general practice. The reasons are several and responsibility must be shared by the medical practitioners, the current system of the general practice, and the patients themselves.
在五家选定的城市全科诊所的家庭医生合作下,对73名患有新发抑郁症的患者进行了为期四个月的全科医生治疗评估。目的是检验一种观点,即全科医生最适合管理大多数心理疾病,而抑郁症被选为全科医疗中最常见的精神疾病。药物治疗是主要的治疗方式,但剂量往往不足或患者未遵医嘱。认为药物治疗不依从部分是由于监督和随访不力以及会诊率过低。会诊率低也被认为可以解释为什么很少有患者认为医患关系有治疗价值。研究结果表明,抑郁症患者在全科医疗中没有得到最佳治疗。原因有几个,医生、当前的全科医疗体系和患者自身都必须承担责任。