• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激控制和剥夺对辨别性反应的影响。

Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding.

作者信息

Powell R W

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):351-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-351.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1973.19-351
PMID:4706239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1334086/
Abstract

Discriminative responding in pigeons was studied under multiple variable-interval extinction schedules in which extinction was correlated with either a tone or a white keylight. The two procedures resulted in weak and strong stimulus control, respectively. In the first experiment, there was no interaction between schedule components when stimulus control was strong and reinforcement was omitted under the previously reinforced component. However, there was marked induction between components when stimulus control was weak and responding was extinguished under the previously reinforced component. In the second experiment, hours of food deprivation was varied under two levels of stimulus control. Deprivation mainly influenced response rates under the extinction stimulus, with greater absolute rate increases occurring the lower the existing level of stimulus control. Increases in responding during the extinction stimulus were four times as great from 24 to 72 hours of deprivation as from 24 to 48 hours under conditions of both high and low stimulus control.

摘要

在多重可变间隔消退程序下研究了鸽子的辨别性反应,其中消退与一个纯音或一个白色按键灯相关联。这两种程序分别导致了较弱和较强的刺激控制。在第一个实验中,当刺激控制较强且在先前强化的成分下省略强化时,程序成分之间没有相互作用。然而,当刺激控制较弱且在先前强化的成分下反应被消退时,成分之间有明显的诱导作用。在第二个实验中,在两种刺激控制水平下改变食物剥夺的时长。剥夺主要影响消退刺激下的反应率,现有刺激控制水平越低,绝对反应率增加得越大。在高刺激控制和低刺激控制条件下,从24小时到72小时剥夺期间消退刺激下反应的增加量是从24小时到48小时剥夺期间的四倍。

相似文献

1
Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding.刺激控制和剥夺对辨别性反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):351-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-351.
2
Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.剥夺效应与刺激控制之间相互作用的证据。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):95-104. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-95.
3
Effects of chlorpromazine on fixed-ratio responding: modification by fixed-interval discriminative stimuli.氯丙嗪对固定比率反应的影响:由固定间隔辨别性刺激所改变
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):195-205. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-195.
4
Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.作为条件性强化物的食物配对刺激:右旋苯丙胺的作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):277-88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277.
5
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?替代性强化增强对改变的抵抗力:巴甫洛夫式或操作性条件作用?
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359.
6
Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.药物对由刺激-强化物和反应-强化物偶联维持的反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):187-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-187.
7
Control by the auditory or the visual element of a compound discriminative stimulus: effects of feedback.复合辨别刺激的听觉或视觉元素控制:反馈的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):251-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-251.
8
An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.对自动塑造行为和操作性行为的峰值转移及行为对比的一项研究。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):101-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-101.
9
Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.在无错误辨别学习过程中,强化频率作为消退诱导攻击行为的一个决定因素。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jan;23(1):121-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-121.
10
Behavioral momentum and relapse of extinguished operant responding.行为动量与消退的操作性反应的复发
Learn Behav. 2009 Nov;37(4):357-64. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.4.357.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of and preschoolers' preferences for variations of multiple-schedule arrangements.多种日程安排变化形式对学龄前儿童的有效性及他们对这些变化形式的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Winter;39(4):475-88. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.48-06.
2
Auditory word discriminations in the pigeon.鸽子的听觉单词辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):269-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-269.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive interaction (induction) in multiple variable-interval, differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate schedules.在多变量间隔、差异增强高率时间表中进行正交互(诱导)。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):51-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-51.
2
Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules.大鼠在多项程序中的对比和诱导。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):289-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-289.
3
Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.辨别学习、峰移和行为对比。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):727-41. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-727.
4
Extinction-induced aggression.灭绝诱发的侵略性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):191-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-191.
5
An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.多重时间表中的交互作用分析。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4(2):107-17. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-107.
6
Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.固定间隔与低比率强化下的行为对比。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4(4):387-91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-387.
7
BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.多重回避程序中的行为对比
J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Sep;8(5):269-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-269.
8
Discrimination learning with and without "errors".有“错误”和无“错误”的辨别学习
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):1-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-1.
9
A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.几种消除行为的程序的比较。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):399-406. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-399.
10
Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding.惩罚性电击强度对辨别性反应的一些影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):109-16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-109.