Schlesselman J J
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep 1;135(1):135-48.
The procedure of in vitro fertilization, including ova collection and embryo culture and transfer, raises concern about the risk of abnormalities arising from the technique. In vitro versus in vivo comparison might be made in the study of preimplantation embryos and spontaneous abortions, the results of amniocentesis, and the findings among fetal deaths and live births. In vivo, 40% to 50% of implantation blastocysts are estimated to have a chromosomal abnormality, over 99% of which are estimated to be eliminated during the course of pregnancy. In principle, the use of early spontaneous abortions can be more efficient than amniocentesis for detecting an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities at birth. Unless in vitro fertilization in humans strongly contradicts the experience in domestic animal reproduction, which suggests no increased risk of abnormalities at birth, a large number of births would be required to provide a definitive assessment of risk.
体外受精程序,包括卵子采集、胚胎培养和移植,引发了人们对该技术产生异常风险的担忧。在对植入前胚胎和自然流产的研究、羊膜穿刺术的结果以及胎儿死亡和活产的研究结果中,可以进行体外与体内的比较。在体内,估计有40%至50%的植入囊胚存在染色体异常,其中超过99%的异常估计在妊娠过程中被消除。原则上,利用早期自然流产检测出生时染色体异常风险增加的效率可能高于羊膜穿刺术。除非人类体外受精与家畜繁殖的经验强烈矛盾(家畜繁殖经验表明出生时异常风险没有增加),否则需要大量的出生案例才能对风险进行明确评估。