Hannay H J, Levin H S, Grossman R G
Cortex. 1979 Jun;15(2):269-83. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(79)80031-3.
A continuous recognition memory task employing 120 line drawings of familiar stimuli was administered to patients recovering from closed head injury of varying severity and control patients. Mildly injured patients obtained significantly more correct responses, and higher memory sensitivity (d') values than moderately and severely injured patients who performed similarly. The measure of response criterion, c, was significantly lower in patients with injury of moderate severity when compared to mildly injured cases and control patients. Controls and mildly injured patients did not differ in their performance. In general, the total correct responses most impressively differentiated head injured patients with measurable coma duration as more than two-thirds had scores below the control group. Group differences in hits, false alarms and misses were examined also. Age and education, skull fracture, and hematoma were generally unrelated to any of the measures, whereas coma duration was significantly related to most measures of mnemonic efficiency.
一项采用120幅熟悉刺激的线条画的连续识别记忆任务被施用于不同严重程度的闭合性颅脑损伤康复患者和对照患者。轻度受伤患者比中度和重度受伤患者获得了显著更多的正确反应,以及更高的记忆敏感性(d')值,而中度和重度受伤患者的表现相似。与轻度受伤病例和对照患者相比,中度严重损伤患者的反应标准(c)测量值显著更低。对照组和轻度受伤患者在表现上没有差异。总体而言,总正确反应最显著地区分了昏迷持续时间可测量的颅脑损伤患者,因为超过三分之二的患者得分低于对照组。还检查了击中、误报和漏报方面的组间差异。年龄、教育程度、颅骨骨折和血肿通常与任何测量指标无关,而昏迷持续时间与大多数记忆效率测量指标显著相关。