Chown B, Bowman J M, Pollock J
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 May 17;112(10):1215-6.
Anti-D (anti-Rho) in the blood of two Rh-negative pregnant women was believed to be due to active immunization. In the first case, however, antibodies were no longer detectable 2 weeks later. In the second case they disappeared by the end of 31 weeks. It was discovered that both women had been given immune globulin (human) because of exposure to rubella. The globulin given to the first woman probably contained about 0.1 mug of anti-D per ml; that given to the second probably contained about 0.6 mug of anti-D per ml. Both babies were O Rh-positive. Both women were given Rh immune globulin after delivery. Both have completed a further pregnancy and no anti-D has been found on many tests. In tests carried out in 1971 all samples of immune globulin (human) examined contained anti-D, but usually in inconsequential trace amounts.
两名Rh阴性孕妇血液中的抗D(抗Rho)被认为是由于主动免疫所致。然而,在第一个病例中,两周后抗体就不再能检测到了。在第二个病例中,抗体在31周结束时消失。发现这两名妇女都因接触风疹而接受了免疫球蛋白(人源)。给第一名妇女的球蛋白每毫升可能含有约0.1微克抗D;给第二名妇女的球蛋白每毫升可能含有约0.6微克抗D。两名婴儿都是O型Rh阳性。两名妇女在分娩后都接受了Rh免疫球蛋白。两人都完成了再次妊娠,多次检测均未发现抗D。在1971年进行的检测中,所有检测的免疫球蛋白(人源)样本都含有抗D,但通常含量微不足道。