• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对患有慢性呼吸道疾病的成年人皮内或皮下注射甲型流感/新泽西/76-A/维多利亚/75病毒疫苗后的反应比较。

Comparison of responses to influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 virus vaccine administered intradermally or subcutaneously to adults with chronic respiratory disease.

作者信息

Herbert F A, Larke R P, Markstad E L

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 1979 Aug;140(2):234-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.2.234.

DOI:10.1093/infdis/140.2.234
PMID:479641
Abstract

Serum HAI (hemagglutination inhibition) antibody responses were compared in two groups of 70 age-matched patients (age range, 17 to 82 years) who were vaccinated with bivalent influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 whole-virus vaccine. The group that was vaccinated intradermally received 40 chick cell-agglutinating units of each viral antigen in 0.1 ml, and the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously received 200 chick cell-agglutinating units of each antigen in 0.5 ml. The serum HAI antibody response to A/New Jersey/76 antigen was significantly higher in the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously; this difference was particularly evident in patients less than or equal to 50 years old. The serologic response to A/Victoria/75 antigen did not differ significantly between the two groups. Levels of antibody before vaccination indicated previous widespread exposure of patients to influenza A/Victoria/75 virus, but not to influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus. Such differences in prior immunologic experience with a particular strain of influenza virus probably determine whether the intradermal route of vaccination is as effective as, or inferior to, the subcutaneous route.

摘要

对两组各70名年龄匹配的患者(年龄范围为17至82岁)进行了比较,这些患者均接种了二价甲型流感/新泽西/76-甲型流感/维多利亚/75全病毒疫苗。皮内接种组在0.1毫升中接种每种病毒抗原40个鸡胚细胞凝集单位,皮下接种组在0.5毫升中接种每种抗原200个鸡胚细胞凝集单位。皮下接种组对甲型流感/新泽西/76抗原的血清血凝抑制(HAI)抗体反应显著更高;这种差异在50岁及以下的患者中尤为明显。两组对甲型流感/维多利亚/75抗原的血清学反应无显著差异。接种前的抗体水平表明患者此前广泛接触过甲型流感/维多利亚/75病毒,但未接触过甲型流感/新泽西/76病毒。对特定流感病毒株先前免疫经历的这种差异可能决定皮内接种途径是否与皮下接种途径一样有效或不如皮下接种途径。

相似文献

1
Comparison of responses to influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 virus vaccine administered intradermally or subcutaneously to adults with chronic respiratory disease.对患有慢性呼吸道疾病的成年人皮内或皮下注射甲型流感/新泽西/76-A/维多利亚/75病毒疫苗后的反应比较。
J Infect Dis. 1979 Aug;140(2):234-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.2.234.
2
A comparison of the intradermal and subcutaneous routes of influenza vaccination with A/New Jersey/76 (swine flu) and A/Victoria/75: report of a study and review of the literature.用A/新泽西/76(猪流感)和A/维多利亚/75流感疫苗进行皮内和皮下接种途径的比较:一项研究报告及文献综述
Am J Public Health. 1979 Dec;69(12):1247-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.12.1247.
3
The immunizing effect of influenza A/New Jersey/76 (Hsw1N1) virus vaccine administered intradermally and intramuscularly to adults.
J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136 Suppl:S466-71. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s466.
4
Intradermal administration of bivalent and monovalent influenza vaccines.二价和单价流感疫苗的皮内注射
Ann Allergy. 1977 Aug;39(2):110-2.
5
Persistence of influenza serum antibodies in humans following immunization with a bivalent A/Victoria and A/New Jersey vaccine.用二价A/维多利亚株和A/新泽西株疫苗免疫后人体流感血清抗体的持久性。
Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Apr 7;120(7):799-802, 831.
6
Serologic responses and systemic reactions in adults after vaccination with bivalent A/Victoria/75-A/New Jersey/76 and monovalent B/Hong Kong/72 influenza vaccines.成人接种二价A/维多利亚/75-A/新泽西/76流感疫苗和单价B/香港/72流感疫苗后的血清学反应及全身反应
J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136 Suppl:S507-17. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s507.
7
Age-related heterologous antibody responses to influenza virus vaccination.流感病毒疫苗接种的年龄相关异源抗体反应。
J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136 Suppl:S686-92. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s686.
8
Serum antibody responses after intradermal vaccination against influenza.皮内接种流感疫苗后的血清抗体反应。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 25;351(22):2286-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043555. Epub 2004 Nov 3.
9
Responses of elderly and chronically ill subjects to bivalent influenza A/New Jersey/8/76 (Hsw1N1)-A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2) vaccines.
J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136 Suppl:S526-32. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s526.
10
Comparison of the hemagglutination-inhibiting and neutralizing antibody responses of volunteers given 400 chick cell-agglutinating units of influenza A/New Jersey/76 split-virus vaccine.
J Infect Dis. 1977 Dec;136 Suppl:S472-4. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_3.s472.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional dose of intradermal compared to intramuscular and subcutaneous vaccination - A systematic review and meta-analysis.皮内与肌内和皮下接种疫苗的小剂量比较 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101868. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101868. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
2
Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: Past, present, and future.使用新型微针装置MicronJet600进行皮内接种:过去、现在与未来。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(4):991-7. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1010871.
3
Current evidence on intradermal influenza vaccines administered by Soluvia™ licensed micro injection system.
关于 Soluvia™ 许可的微注射系统皮内接种流感疫苗的现有证据。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 Jan;8(1):67-75. doi: 10.4161/hv.8.1.18419. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
4
Microneedle-based vaccines.基于微针的疫苗。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;333:369-93. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-92165-3_18.
5
Preclinical evaluation of microneedle technology for intradermal delivery of influenza vaccines.用于皮内递送流感疫苗的微针技术的临床前评估。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Apr;14(4):375-81. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00387-06. Epub 2007 Feb 28.