Herbert F A, Larke R P, Markstad E L
J Infect Dis. 1979 Aug;140(2):234-8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.2.234.
Serum HAI (hemagglutination inhibition) antibody responses were compared in two groups of 70 age-matched patients (age range, 17 to 82 years) who were vaccinated with bivalent influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 whole-virus vaccine. The group that was vaccinated intradermally received 40 chick cell-agglutinating units of each viral antigen in 0.1 ml, and the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously received 200 chick cell-agglutinating units of each antigen in 0.5 ml. The serum HAI antibody response to A/New Jersey/76 antigen was significantly higher in the group that was vaccinated subcutaneously; this difference was particularly evident in patients less than or equal to 50 years old. The serologic response to A/Victoria/75 antigen did not differ significantly between the two groups. Levels of antibody before vaccination indicated previous widespread exposure of patients to influenza A/Victoria/75 virus, but not to influenza A/New Jersey/76 virus. Such differences in prior immunologic experience with a particular strain of influenza virus probably determine whether the intradermal route of vaccination is as effective as, or inferior to, the subcutaneous route.
对两组各70名年龄匹配的患者(年龄范围为17至82岁)进行了比较,这些患者均接种了二价甲型流感/新泽西/76-甲型流感/维多利亚/75全病毒疫苗。皮内接种组在0.1毫升中接种每种病毒抗原40个鸡胚细胞凝集单位,皮下接种组在0.5毫升中接种每种抗原200个鸡胚细胞凝集单位。皮下接种组对甲型流感/新泽西/76抗原的血清血凝抑制(HAI)抗体反应显著更高;这种差异在50岁及以下的患者中尤为明显。两组对甲型流感/维多利亚/75抗原的血清学反应无显著差异。接种前的抗体水平表明患者此前广泛接触过甲型流感/维多利亚/75病毒,但未接触过甲型流感/新泽西/76病毒。对特定流感病毒株先前免疫经历的这种差异可能决定皮内接种途径是否与皮下接种途径一样有效或不如皮下接种途径。