Baer P E, Collins F H, Bourianoff G G, Ketchel M F
Psychosom Med. 1979 Jun;41(4):321-30. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197906000-00006.
A 16-item self-report instrument was designed and cross-validated, comparing essential hypertensives with normotensives. After item selection using two sets of standardization groups, scores obtained from three additional sets of hypertensive and normotensive groups were significantly different. The scores were not significantly related to variables such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, hypochondriasis, social desirability or target organ involvement. The instrument's factorial structure for hypertensives consisted of factors labeled anger arousal, resentment, anxiety, and attention seeking. Hypertensives reported higher levels of hostility and anxiety than normotensives. High and low scoring subgroups on the instrument were examined on the 16 PF, with hypertensive high scorers demonstrating a different profile than low scoring hypertensives. The existence of two psychological types of essential hypertensives was suggested.
设计了一份包含16个项目的自我报告工具,并进行了交叉验证,将原发性高血压患者与血压正常者进行比较。在使用两组标准化组进行项目选择后,从另外三组高血压和血压正常组获得的分数存在显著差异。这些分数与年龄、性别、社会经济地位、疑病症、社会期望或靶器官受累等变量没有显著相关性。高血压患者的该工具的因子结构由标记为愤怒唤起、怨恨、焦虑和寻求关注的因子组成。高血压患者报告的敌意和焦虑水平高于血压正常者。在16种人格因素问卷(16PF)上对该工具得分高和低的亚组进行了检查,高血压高分者表现出与低分高血压患者不同的特征。提示原发性高血压存在两种心理类型。