Bogner P, Sajid A W, Ford D L
J Med Educ. 1975 Jul;50(7):677-82. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197507000-00005.
An audio-based method of instruction on the topic of diuretic drugs was compared with the lecture method using a random sample of 66 sophomore medical students. A cognitive test given to measure achievement as a result of the two treatments showed that the average score of 80 percent for the audio group was significantly higher (p smaller than 0.25) than the 75 percent for the lecture group. A comparison of the lowest quartile scores in each group revealed that the audio-based group also scored higher 13 points, p smaller than .05) than the lecture group; however, no difference was noted in the upper three quartile scores of the two groups. The amount of time spent studying did not appear to be a factor. A second test given to meausre attitudes toward the audio method showed strong positive views among students.
采用随机抽样的66名大二医学生,将一种基于音频的利尿药教学方法与讲座法进行了比较。为衡量两种教学方法的效果而进行的一项认知测试表明,音频组80%的平均得分显著高于讲座组的75%(p小于0.25)。对每组最低四分位数分数的比较显示,基于音频的小组得分也比讲座组高13分(p小于0.05);然而,两组上三个四分位数分数没有差异。学习所花费的时间似乎不是一个因素。为衡量对音频教学法的态度而进行的第二项测试表明,学生们对此持强烈的积极看法。