Malone J M, Wangensteen S L, Moore W S, Keown K
Ann Surg. 1979 Sep;190(3):342-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197909000-00009.
Neither histologic nor clinical staging reliably correlates with patient survival or the time course of tumor metastatic spread. There is no general biologic tumor marker which is able to distinguish those patients with microscopic residual cancer who may benefit from adjuvant anticancer treatment from those patients cured by their primary treatment who do not require additional anticancer therapy. Our data suggest that tumor activation and inhibition of fibrinolysis are related to the likelihood of tumor spread. Calculation of mean activation/inhibition ratios (A/I ratios) in groups of tumors with and without metastatic spread demonstrated a statistically significant difference between their respective A/I ratios (p less than 0.001). In addition, the mean activation/inhibition ratios for secondary or "metastatic" lesions were significantly different from the mean activation/inhibition ratios of the original tumors from which they metastasized (p less than 0.001). Therefore, tumor activation/inhibition ratios would appear to have clinical reliability as biologic markers for the presence or absence of tumor metastases. These data may have important therapeutic implications that would permit the use of activation/inhibition ratios as a biologic marker for the presence or absence of tumor spread at the time of primary surgical excision of the tumor. These observations warrant further investigation into the mechanisms of tumor interaction with the fibrinolytic system.
组织学分期和临床分期均不能可靠地与患者生存率或肿瘤转移扩散的时间进程相关联。目前尚无一种通用的生物肿瘤标志物能够区分那些可能从辅助抗癌治疗中获益的存在微小残留癌的患者与那些通过初次治疗已治愈且无需额外抗癌治疗的患者。我们的数据表明,肿瘤纤溶激活和抑制与肿瘤扩散的可能性相关。对有转移扩散和无转移扩散的肿瘤组的平均激活/抑制比(A/I比)进行计算,结果显示它们各自的A/I比之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p小于0.001)。此外,继发性或“转移性”病变的平均激活/抑制比与它们所转移的原发肿瘤的平均激活/抑制比显著不同(p小于0.001)。因此,肿瘤激活/抑制比似乎可作为判断肿瘤转移与否的生物标志物,具有临床可靠性。这些数据可能具有重要的治疗意义,这使得激活/抑制比能够作为在肿瘤初次手术切除时判断肿瘤是否扩散的生物标志物。这些观察结果值得进一步研究肿瘤与纤溶系统相互作用的机制。