Goodwin W B, Geller J D, Quinlan D M
Br J Med Psychol. 1979 Mar;52(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02489.x.
Eighty-three male psychotherapists varying on A-B type and experience orally responded to tape-recordings of simulated schizoid and neurotic patients in the privacy of their own offices. Five dimensions of therapist response were studied: accurate empathy, positive social-emotional reactions, negative social-emotional reactions, length of response and proportion of declarative statements. Although the simple A-B interaction effect was not found, significant second-order interactions were found for both accurate empathy and positive reactions which indicated that the predicted interaction effect tends to be upheld for inexperienced therapists but attenuated or reversed for experienced therapists. A significantly reversed interaction for experienced therapists' response length was also found. Examination of the results from this study and previous studies suggested a revision of the A-B interaction hypothesis: for inexperienced therapists, As will be more effective with schizoids/schizophrenics than Bs, whereas Bs will surpass As with neurotics; for experienced therapists, however, this interaction will be attenuated or reversed. Speculations about underlying processes in A-B interaction phenomena were offered.
八十三名在A-B类型和经验方面存在差异的男性心理治疗师,在自己办公室的私密环境中,口头回应了模拟类精神分裂症患者和神经症患者的录音。研究了治疗师回应的五个维度:准确共情、积极的社会情感反应、消极的社会情感反应、回应长度和陈述性语句的比例。虽然未发现简单的A-B交互效应,但在准确共情和积极反应方面均发现了显著的二阶交互效应,这表明预测的交互效应在经验不足的治疗师中往往成立,但在经验丰富的治疗师中则减弱或逆转。还发现了经验丰富的治疗师回应长度的显著反向交互效应。对本研究和以往研究结果的审视表明,需对A-B交互假设进行修正:对于经验不足的治疗师,A型治疗师在治疗类精神分裂症患者/精神分裂症患者时比B型治疗师更有效,而B型治疗师在治疗神经症患者时会超过A型治疗师;然而,对于经验丰富的治疗师,这种交互效应将减弱或逆转。文中还对A-B交互现象的潜在过程进行了推测。