Kogut D, Lynch D J
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jan;40(1):72-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198401)40:1<72::aid-jclp2270400113>3.0.co;2-l.
Evaluated an assumption from previous psychotherapy analogue studies, namely, that trained psychotherapists and untrained quasi-therapists with personality similarities will respond similarly to patient presentations. Ss were 24 male psychotherapists and 24 male undergraduate students, chosen partially on the basis of their responses to an A-B personality scale derived from the work of Whitehorn and Betz (1954). The three-factor experimental design included S personality type (A or B), S professional status (psychotherapist vs. student), and videotaped patient simulations (neurotic vs. schizoid), with all Ss exposed to both patient prototypes. Therapists demonstrated a higher degree of accurate empathy, were less active, made shorter responses, and used more declarative sentences (p less than .01 for each variable). Second-order interaction effects indicated that therapist personality type X patient type pairings produced opposite results for quasi-therapists when compared to professional therapists.
评估了先前心理治疗模拟研究中的一个假设,即具有人格相似性的训练有素的心理治疗师和未经训练的准治疗师对患者表现的反应会相似。研究对象为24名男性心理治疗师和24名男性本科生,部分是根据他们对源自怀特霍恩和贝茨(1954年)研究的A - B人格量表的回答来挑选的。三因素实验设计包括被试的人格类型(A或B)、被试的专业身份(心理治疗师与学生)以及录像的患者模拟(神经症患者与精神分裂症患者),所有被试都接触两种患者原型。治疗师表现出更高程度的准确共情,活跃度较低,反应较短,且使用更多陈述句(每个变量的p值均小于0.01)。二阶交互作用效应表明,与专业治疗师相比,准治疗师的治疗师人格类型与患者类型配对产生了相反的结果。