Webb C D, Moody M D
Appl Microbiol. 1969 May;17(5):682-4. doi: 10.1128/am.17.5.682-684.1969.
A direct fluorometric test for the rapid detection of group A streptococci from throat swabs was compared with the microscopic fluorescent-antibody test. Formalinized throat swab cultures (490) were examined by the two methods, and the results agreed on 84% of the specimens. In another comparison, 15-hr broth cultures of 103 freshly taken throat swabs were tested by both methods. Of the specimens tested, 101 (98%) were either positive or negative by both methods. In all cases, the latter results correlated with the demonstration of presence or absence of group A streptococci in the specimens by cultural isolation and precipitin grouping tests. It may be feasible to use the direct fluorometric test in a diagnostic laboratory as described or possibly to adapt it for automatic processing of throat swab cultures.
将一种用于从咽拭子中快速检测A群链球菌的直接荧光检测法与显微荧光抗体检测法进行了比较。用这两种方法检测了490份经福尔马林固定的咽拭子培养物,84%的标本结果一致。在另一项比较中,用这两种方法对103份新采集的咽拭子进行15小时肉汤培养检测。在检测的标本中,101份(98%)通过两种方法检测结果均为阳性或阴性。在所有情况下,后一种结果与通过培养分离和沉淀素分组试验证明标本中A群链球菌的有无相关。按照所述方法在诊断实验室使用直接荧光检测法可能是可行的,或者有可能对其进行改进以用于咽拭子培养物的自动处理。