Suppr超能文献

三种检测咽拭子中A组链球菌方法的比较。

Comparison of three methods for detection of group A streptococci in throat swabs.

作者信息

Anhalt J P, Heiter B J, Naumovitz D W, Bourbeau P P

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2135-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2135-2138.1992.

Abstract

Group A streptococci are generally detected in throat swabs by (i) rapid antigen tests, (ii) conventional culture, or (iii) combinations of both. Direct fluorescent-antibody testing of a 2-h enrichment broth (FA/EN) was an accepted method for same-day results before the advent of rapid antigen tests. We compared FA/EN in Todd-Hewitt Broth (THB) with conventional culture and a rapid antigen test, TestPack Strep A (TPS). Nine hundred seventy specimens were evaluated in this study. Cultures were performed for 48 h on sheep blood agar (SBA) incubated aerobically and on a selective agar for group A streptococci (SSA) incubated in 5 to 10% CO2. Following a 2-h incubation, the fluorescent-antibody test was performed. A subculture of the centrifuged sediment from the THB enrichment was also done. In comparison with a positive culture on SBA or SSA or subculture of the THB pellet, the sensitivities and specificities of the different methods were as follows: SBA, 92 and 100%; SSA, 92 and 100%; TPS, 68 and 99%; FA/EN, 88 and 98%. The FA/EN method offers the potential for definitive finalized reports on the same day as specimen collection with greater sensitivity than TPS. This study included sequential plating and rapid antigen testing of a single swab. In a separate set of experiments to validate this study design, it was shown that recovery of streptococci from swabs plated sequentially on five plates did not vary with the order of plating and the actual proportion of organisms recovered from a swab on a single plate was only 1%.

摘要

A组链球菌通常通过以下方法在咽拭子中检测出来:(i)快速抗原检测,(ii)传统培养,或(iii)两者结合。在快速抗原检测出现之前,对2小时增菌肉汤进行直接荧光抗体检测(FA/EN)是获得当日结果的一种公认方法。我们将托德-休伊特肉汤(THB)中的FA/EN与传统培养和快速抗原检测TestPack A群链球菌(TPS)进行了比较。本研究评估了970份标本。在需氧培养的羊血琼脂(SBA)和在5%至10%二氧化碳中培养的A组链球菌选择性琼脂(SSA)上进行48小时培养。培养2小时后,进行荧光抗体检测。还对THB增菌液离心沉淀物进行了传代培养。与SBA或SSA上的阳性培养或THB沉淀物的传代培养相比,不同方法的敏感性和特异性如下:SBA,92%和%100;SSA,92%和100%;TPS,68%和99%;FA/EN,88%和98%。FA/EN方法有可能在标本采集当天提供最终确定的报告,且敏感性高于TPS。本研究包括对单个拭子进行连续接种和快速抗原检测。在另一组验证该研究设计的实验中,结果表明,从依次接种在五个平板上的拭子中回收链球菌的情况不受接种顺序的影响,并且从单个平板上的拭子中实际回收的微生物比例仅为1%。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Culturing of throat swabs: end of an era?咽喉拭子培养:一个时代的终结?
J Pediatr. 1985 Jul;107(1):85-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80620-x.
8
Statistical methods in microbiology.微生物学中的统计方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):219-26. doi: 10.1128/CMR.3.3.219.
10
Group A streptococcal infections and acute rheumatic fever.A组链球菌感染与急性风湿热。
N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 12;325(11):783-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109123251106.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验