Chitwood L A, Jennings M B, Riley H D
Appl Microbiol. 1969 Aug;18(2):193-7. doi: 10.1128/am.18.2.193-197.1969.
During the 12-month period primary throat, wound, and skin cultures, tentatively identified as B streptococci, were submitted by 10 different clinical laboratories for evaluation. A total of 692 beta-hemolytic streptococci were isolated from cultures submitted and examined in parallel by the fluorescent-antibody, precipitin, and bacitracin techniques. An evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity in conjunction with basic and personnel costs was determined for each method. The standard Lancefield precipitin method was established as the standard by which the bacitracin and flourescent antibody techniques were compared. With some variation depending on the commerical source of the disc, approximately 7% of the strains examined produced false reactions with the bacitracin disc. False-negative reactions were rarely noted by the group A fluorescent antibody technique (0.5%), but an appreciable number of other Lancefield groups (B, C, and G) were nonreactive with homologous conjugates.
在为期12个月的时间里,10个不同的临床实验室提交了初步鉴定为B组链球菌的原发性咽喉、伤口和皮肤培养物以供评估。通过荧光抗体、沉淀素和杆菌肽技术,从提交的培养物中总共分离出692株β溶血性链球菌,并进行了平行检测。对每种方法的特异性、敏感性以及基础成本和人力成本进行了评估。将标准的兰斯菲尔德沉淀素法确立为比较杆菌肽和荧光抗体技术的标准。根据药敏纸片的商业来源不同会有一些差异,大约7%的检测菌株对杆菌肽药敏纸片产生假反应。A组荧光抗体技术很少出现假阴性反应(0.5%),但相当数量的其他兰斯菲尔德组(B、C和G)与同源结合物无反应。