Edwards E A, Larson G L
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Dec;26(6):899-903. doi: 10.1128/am.26.6.899-903.1973.
The counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIE) method of grouping streptococci was more sensitive than the capillary precipitin method. The precipitate was easier to read, and the test was simple to perform and required fewer reagents. An autoclave-Pronase-B extraction procedure is described and was found superior to either acid, Pronase-B, or the autoclave extraction procedures for recovering groupable polysaccharide from different strains of streptococcal groups A, B, C, D, F, and E. Data obtained from over 400 strains indicate that the sensitivity of the CIE and a more efficient extraction of groupable polysaccharide provides a simple method for rapid diagnosis of streptococcal infections.
链球菌分组的对流免疫电泳(CIE)方法比毛细管沉淀素方法更灵敏。沉淀物更易于读取,该检测操作简单且所需试剂较少。本文描述了一种高压灭菌-链霉蛋白酶-B提取程序,发现该程序在从A、B、C、D、F和E组不同菌株中回收可分组多糖方面优于酸提取法、链霉蛋白酶-B提取法或高压灭菌提取法。从400多个菌株获得的数据表明,CIE的灵敏度和更高效的可分组多糖提取为链球菌感染的快速诊断提供了一种简单方法。