Russell E W
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jul;35(3):611-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197907)35:3<611::aid-jclp2270350325>3.0.co;2-v.
Compared four groups of matched Ss (40 each) in order to examine different subtest patterns of brain damage on the WAIS, using F-tests and age mean profiles. The groups were: Normals, diffuse cortical degeneration, right and left hemisphere damage. The results indicated three patterns: (1) a normal pattern; (2) a diffuse degenerative and right hemisphere pattern; and (3) a left hemisphere pattern. The diffuse degenerative results were not significantly different from the right hemisphere results. The left hemisphere pattern had no large verbal vs. performance differences. These patterns appear to be produced by the interaction of three brain damage effects: (1) a general effect; (2) a right hemisphere effect; and (3) a left hemisphere effect. Verbal tests are both "hold" and left hemisphere tests, while three Performance Tests are "don't hold" and right hemisphere tests. The WAIS requires other specific tests of brain damage for an adequate assessment of brain damage.
为了通过F检验和年龄均值剖面图研究韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)上脑损伤的不同子测验模式,对四组匹配的受试者(每组40人)进行了比较。这四组分别是:正常人组、弥漫性皮质变性组、右半球损伤组和左半球损伤组。结果显示出三种模式:(1)正常模式;(2)弥漫性变性和右半球模式;(3)左半球模式。弥漫性变性的结果与右半球的结果没有显著差异。左半球模式在言语测验和操作测验之间没有很大差异。这些模式似乎是由三种脑损伤效应的相互作用产生的:(1)一般效应;(2)右半球效应;(3)左半球效应。言语测验既是“保持性”测验也是左半球测验,而三项操作测验是“非保持性”测验且是右半球测验。WAIS需要其他特定的脑损伤测验来充分评估脑损伤情况。