Suppr超能文献

韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)的三种脑损伤模式。

Three patterns of brain damage of the WAIS.

作者信息

Russell E W

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1979 Jul;35(3):611-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197907)35:3<611::aid-jclp2270350325>3.0.co;2-v.

Abstract

Compared four groups of matched Ss (40 each) in order to examine different subtest patterns of brain damage on the WAIS, using F-tests and age mean profiles. The groups were: Normals, diffuse cortical degeneration, right and left hemisphere damage. The results indicated three patterns: (1) a normal pattern; (2) a diffuse degenerative and right hemisphere pattern; and (3) a left hemisphere pattern. The diffuse degenerative results were not significantly different from the right hemisphere results. The left hemisphere pattern had no large verbal vs. performance differences. These patterns appear to be produced by the interaction of three brain damage effects: (1) a general effect; (2) a right hemisphere effect; and (3) a left hemisphere effect. Verbal tests are both "hold" and left hemisphere tests, while three Performance Tests are "don't hold" and right hemisphere tests. The WAIS requires other specific tests of brain damage for an adequate assessment of brain damage.

摘要

为了通过F检验和年龄均值剖面图研究韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)上脑损伤的不同子测验模式,对四组匹配的受试者(每组40人)进行了比较。这四组分别是:正常人组、弥漫性皮质变性组、右半球损伤组和左半球损伤组。结果显示出三种模式:(1)正常模式;(2)弥漫性变性和右半球模式;(3)左半球模式。弥漫性变性的结果与右半球的结果没有显著差异。左半球模式在言语测验和操作测验之间没有很大差异。这些模式似乎是由三种脑损伤效应的相互作用产生的:(1)一般效应;(2)右半球效应;(3)左半球效应。言语测验既是“保持性”测验也是左半球测验,而三项操作测验是“非保持性”测验且是右半球测验。WAIS需要其他特定的脑损伤测验来充分评估脑损伤情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验