Sauls H S
Pediatrics. 1979 Oct;64(4):523-7.
Comparing the morbidity of breast-fed and bottle-fed infants is confounded by inherent differences in breast-feeding and bottle-feeding mothers and their infants. Self-selection introduces complex variables encompassing much more than milk source used for infant feeding. Reasons for selecting breast or bottle feeding relate to demographic, socioeconomic, educational, ethnic, cultural, and psychological factors, as well as maternal and infant physical and emotional health. Many of the differences in the maternal populations may affect infant care practices, access to medical care, and infant health status. Studies published to date have not quantified these confounding effects and other potential biases in comparing morbidity to breast- and bottle-fed infants and the relationship between milk source and incidence of infantile disease remains in question. There is need for more cautious use of the available data and investigators must seek ways to design future studies to take into account the differences between breast-feeding and bottle-feeding mothers that affect both reported and actual infant morbidity.
比较母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养婴儿的发病率会因母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养的母亲及其婴儿的内在差异而变得复杂。自我选择引入了复杂的变量,这些变量所涵盖的远不止用于婴儿喂养的奶源。选择母乳喂养或奶瓶喂养的原因涉及人口统计学、社会经济、教育、种族、文化和心理因素,以及母婴的身心健康。母亲群体中的许多差异可能会影响婴儿护理方式、获得医疗保健的机会以及婴儿健康状况。迄今为止发表的研究尚未对这些混杂效应和其他潜在偏差进行量化,在比较母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养婴儿的发病率以及奶源与婴儿疾病发病率之间的关系方面仍存在疑问。需要更谨慎地使用现有数据,研究人员必须设法设计未来的研究,以考虑到母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养母亲之间影响报告的和实际的婴儿发病率的差异。