Dohrenwend B S, Martin J L
Am J Community Psychol. 1979 Aug;7(4):453-68. doi: 10.1007/BF00894386.
A wide variety of laboratory and clinical studies have indicated that stressful events are most harmful when they are perceived as uncontrollable. However, these studies diverge on the question of whether perceptions of control of stressful events are determined by environmental contingencies associated with the events or by a stable expectancy of the perceiver. In a community study 118 respondents were asked to report stressful life events experienced in the last year and were then asked to what extent they anticipated and controlled the occurrence of each event. Data were collected in two waves 1 year apart. Analysis of the reliability, within each wave, of perceptions of control does not indicate a strong personal expectancy effect. It does show some evidence of environmental determination of perceptions, but this result is not consistent on the two waves. These results are interpreted in relation to the issue of ways of reducing harmful effects of stressful life events.
各种各样的实验室研究和临床研究表明,当应激事件被视为无法控制时,其危害最大。然而,这些研究在应激事件的控制感是由与事件相关的环境偶然性决定,还是由感知者的稳定预期决定这一问题上存在分歧。在一项社区研究中,118名受访者被要求报告过去一年中经历的应激性生活事件,然后被问及他们对每一个事件的发生预期和控制程度如何。数据在相隔一年的两个时间段收集。对每一个时间段内控制感认知的可靠性分析并未表明存在强烈的个人预期效应。确实有一些证据表明控制感认知受环境影响,但这一结果在两个时间段并不一致。这些结果是结合减少应激性生活事件有害影响的方法这一问题来解读的。