• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多药滥用人群中对多次剂量速可巴比妥和甲喹酮耐受性的剂量反应研究。

Dose-response studies on tolerance to multiple doses of secobarbital and methaqualone in a polydrug abuse population.

作者信息

Faulkner T P, Hayden J H, Mehta C M, Olson D A, Comstock E G

出版信息

Clin Toxicol. 1979;15(1):23-37. doi: 10.3109/15563657908992476.

DOI:10.3109/15563657908992476
PMID:498734
Abstract

Patients from a polydrug abuse treatment program were titrated with either secobarbital or methaqualone, their primary drug of abuse, to a state of mild intoxication, consisting of lateral and vertical nystagmus, ataxia, slurred speech, and drownsiness. The mean dose required to produce each sign was compared to that determined in a similarly treated control group. Tolerance to secobarbital was more easily demonstrated than tolerance to methaqualone, and nystagmus was the least sensitive indicator of patient tolerance. The individual signs were also cumulated into a graded rating scale of central nervous system depression which would be related to the dose administered. Tolerence was easily demonstrated at the higher stages of toxicity for secobarbital in the overall patient population, but tolerance to methaqualone was only unequivocal in the subjects indicating a relatively high frequency of abuse. Tolerance to methaqualone occurred at the lower stages of toxicity, suggesting that there is a difference between tolerance to secobarbital and tolerance to methaqualone. There was no indication that patients who also abuse alcohol are more tolerant than their patient counterparts. The patients who also had a history of amphetamine abuse, however, were less tolerant than the nonusers of these drugs.

摘要

来自多药滥用治疗项目的患者,用速可巴比妥或甲喹酮(他们主要滥用的药物)滴定至轻度中毒状态,表现为水平及垂直眼球震颤、共济失调、言语不清和嗜睡。将产生每种体征所需的平均剂量与在类似治疗的对照组中确定的剂量进行比较。与对甲喹酮的耐受性相比,对速可巴比妥的耐受性更容易表现出来,并且眼球震颤是患者耐受性最不敏感的指标。各个体征还被累积到一个与给药剂量相关的中枢神经系统抑制分级量表中。在总体患者群体中,速可巴比妥在较高毒性阶段很容易表现出耐受性,但甲喹酮的耐受性仅在表明滥用频率相对较高的受试者中明确存在。对甲喹酮的耐受性出现在较低毒性阶段,这表明对速可巴比妥的耐受性和对甲喹酮的耐受性之间存在差异。没有迹象表明同时滥用酒精的患者比其他患者更具耐受性。然而,有苯丙胺滥用史的患者比未使用这些药物的患者耐受性更低。

相似文献

1
Dose-response studies on tolerance to multiple doses of secobarbital and methaqualone in a polydrug abuse population.多药滥用人群中对多次剂量速可巴比妥和甲喹酮耐受性的剂量反应研究。
Clin Toxicol. 1979;15(1):23-37. doi: 10.3109/15563657908992476.
2
Self-administration of amphetamine, secobarbital and methaqualone in the dog.
Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 1978;21:391-4.
3
[Comparative evaluation of Mnadrax, secobarbital and placebo in the mental patient: Mandrax tolerance and Mandrax-secobarbital cross tolerance].
Int Z Klin Pharmakol Ther Toxikol. 1968 Jul;1(5):417-23.
4
Comparative drug effects and abuse liability of lorazepam, buspirone, and secobarbital in nondependent subjects.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1992 Apr;12(2):79-85.
5
Clinical implications of warfarin interactions with five sedatives.
Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jan;35(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90560-3.
6
Are clinical impressions of adolescent substance use accurate?对青少年物质使用的临床印象准确吗?
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e536-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0098.
7
The effects of methaqualone on the temperature regulation of mice.
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1977 May;17(1):41-52.
8
Comparison of ethanol and barbiturate physical dependence.乙醇与巴比妥酸盐身体依赖性的比较。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Sep;218(3):701-8.
9
NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Coumarin (CAS No. 91-64-5) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies).香豆素(CAS编号91-64-5)在F344/N大鼠和B6C3F1小鼠中的NTP毒理学和致癌性研究(灌胃研究)
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1993 Sep;422:1-340.
10
Fatal hyperthermia following haloperidol therapy of sedative-hypnotic withdrawal.使用氟哌啶醇治疗镇静催眠药戒断后出现致命性高热。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1978 Aug;39(8):673-5.