Biran S
Confin Psychiatr. 1979;22(3):176-82.
The main common theme in psychoanalysis and Marxist sociology is the understanding that it is not consciousness that determines being, but being (spiritual, social) that determines consciousness. The different variations of Marxist movements today are in fact distant from Marx's theory of sociology. They have become representatives of utopian socialism, using anarchistic methods to achieve that aim. This development can only be understood as a social neurosis, with the narcistic frustation of the intellectual class as its cause, and grandiose claims, intolerance, dogmatic thinking and destructive behaviour as its symptoms. The only justified criticism of psychoanalysis from the pseudo-Marxist side is based on the imperfection and error in the analytical doctrine of superego. This should be replaced by the idea of conscious, subjective, emotional morality which clearly explains the aggression contained in social structures.
并非意识决定存在,而是存在(精神的、社会的)决定意识。当今马克思主义运动的不同变体实际上与马克思的社会学理论相去甚远。它们已成为乌托邦社会主义的代表,采用无政府主义方法来实现这一目标。这种发展只能被理解为一种社会神经症,其根源是知识阶层的自恋受挫,症状是夸大的主张、不容忍、教条式思维和破坏性行为。伪马克思主义一方对精神分析的唯一合理批评基于超我分析学说中的不完善和错误。这应由有意识的、主观的、情感的道德观念所取代,这种道德观念能清晰解释社会结构中所包含的攻击性。