Hinde R A, Spencer-Booth Y
Science. 1971 Jul 9;173(3992):111-8. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3992.111.
To summarize, data on the course of development of mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeys have been presented; a method for teasing apart the relative roles of mother and infant in causing changes or differences in the interaction described; and the complexity of the social nexus, within which the relationship is set, stressed. When the mother is removed for a few days, the infant calls a great deal at first and then shows depressed locomotor and play activity. These symptoms may last for a month after the mother's return. Simple tests given 6 months and even 2 years later strongly suggest that the differences (between infants that have had such a separation experience and infants that have not) are persistent. Are these data relevant to the human case? The rhesus monkey has no verbal language and a much less complex social development than man. Furthermore, its social environment is quite different from that found in any human culture. Parallels between monkey and man must therefore be scrutinized carefully before being used as a basis for generalization. But the facts show that a brief separation experience produces in rhesus monkey infants symptoms that are very similar (except for the apparent absence of a "phase of detachment" on reunion) to those in human infants (25). While age of separation, within the rather narrow limits used here, was a variable of minor importance, the effects of the separation varied, as in the human case, with the length of the separation experience and the sex of the infant. Differences in the techniques of experimenters, as well as differences in the species, prevent precise comparisons of the roles of the mother-infant relationships; nevertheless, the nature of the relationship appears to be an important variable in both monkey and man. There would seem, therefore, to be strong reasons for thinking that we are dealing with comparable phenomena. If that is the case, the fact that monkeys function at a simpler conceptual level than man limits the complexity of the explanatory hypotheses necessary in the human case. In addition, the finding that such a brief separation experience, involving removal of the mother but no exposure to a strange environment, can produce effects lasting for months or years in rhesus monkeys strengthens the evidence that long-term effects may occur also in man. Finally, this analysis provides bases for attempts to predict individual differences in the effects of a period of separation on rhesus infants, and the parallels with man suggest that examination of the same variables in the human case would be worthwhile.
总之,本文呈现了恒河猴母婴关系发展过程的数据;介绍了一种区分母亲和婴儿在导致所述互动变化或差异中相对作用的方法;强调了母婴关系所处的社会关系网络的复杂性。当母亲被带走几天时,婴儿起初会大量呼叫,随后表现出运动和玩耍活动减少。这些症状可能在母亲回来后持续一个月。在6个月甚至2年后进行的简单测试有力地表明,(有过这种分离经历的婴儿与没有这种经历的婴儿之间的)差异是持续存在的。这些数据与人类的情况相关吗?恒河猴没有语言,其社会发展比人类简单得多。此外,其社会环境与任何人类文化中的社会环境都大不相同。因此,在将猴子与人类的相似之处用作概括的基础之前,必须仔细审视。但事实表明,短暂的分离经历在恒河猴婴儿身上产生的症状(除了重聚时明显没有“分离阶段”外)与人类婴儿的症状非常相似(25)。虽然在这里使用的相当狭窄的范围内,分离的年龄是一个不太重要的变量,但与人类情况一样,分离的影响因分离经历的时长和婴儿的性别而异。实验者技术的差异以及物种的差异妨碍了对母婴关系作用的精确比较;然而,这种关系的性质在猴子和人类中似乎都是一个重要变量。因此,似乎有充分的理由认为我们正在处理可比的现象。如果是这样,猴子在比人类更简单的概念层面上运作这一事实限制了人类情况下所需解释性假设的复杂性。此外,发现这样一次短暂的分离经历,即母亲被带走但未接触陌生环境,会在恒河猴身上产生持续数月或数年的影响,这进一步证明了长期影响在人类中也可能发生。最后,这种分析为预测恒河猴婴儿分离期影响的个体差异提供了基础,与人类的相似之处表明,在人类案例中研究相同的变量是值得的。