• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为有效资源管理和问责制进行项目评估。

Program evaluation for effective resource management and accountability.

作者信息

McCool A C

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1979 Nov;75(5):564-6.

PMID:500986
Abstract

A means of determining the effectiveness of public programs as a basis for justifying resource allocation to these programs is urgently needed. Program evaluation can provide the data base required for program decision-making and modification. A ten-step model for planning and carrying out an evaluation is suggested as a guideline for program personnel who may be assigned to evaluation responsibilities. Nutrition professionals must become aware of the increasing need for evaluation and of the procedures for conducting the evaluation process within programs for which they are responsible. Failure to provide documentation of adequate, on-going evaluation of effectiveness may lead to a loss of resources for the program and, ultimately, to the demise of the nutritional care program.

摘要

迫切需要一种确定公共项目有效性的方法,以此作为向这些项目分配资源的依据。项目评估可以提供项目决策和修改所需的数据库。建议采用一个十步模型来规划和开展评估,作为可能被分配评估职责的项目人员的指导方针。营养专业人员必须意识到对评估的需求日益增加,以及在他们负责的项目中进行评估过程的程序。未能提供充分、持续的有效性评估文件,可能导致项目资源流失,并最终导致营养护理项目的消亡。

相似文献

1
Program evaluation for effective resource management and accountability.为有效资源管理和问责制进行项目评估。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1979 Nov;75(5):564-6.
2
Nutrition assessment: a management tool for providing quality care.
J Can Diet Assoc. 1987 Fall;48(4):214-8.
3
Tightening income documentation in a means-tested program: who stays away?在一项经济状况调查项目中收紧收入证明要求:哪些人会不再参与?
Eval Rev. 2008 Jun;32(3):273-97. doi: 10.1177/0193841X07309689. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
4
Economic aspects of clinical decision making: evaluating clinical programs.临床决策的经济因素:评估临床项目
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1988 Mar;45(3):554-60.
5
Conceptual framework for nutrition surveillance systems.营养监测系统的概念框架。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(3):254-64.
6
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
7
Health care, federalism and the new Social Union.医疗保健、联邦制与新的社会联盟。
CMAJ. 2000 Apr 18;162(8):1171-4.
8
Evaluation of USDA food programs.美国农业部食品计划评估。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1972 Mar;60(3):193-6.
9
Focus on sustainability.关注可持续性。
AID Eval News. 1990 Jul-Aug:1-16.
10
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.