Marsh G M, Enterline P E
J Occup Med. 1979 Oct;21(10):665-70.
The completeness of cohorts identified for historical prospective studies of occupational diseases is subject to many sources of error, including clerical oversight or negligence and poor company record-deeping practices. It is impossible to verify the completeness of occupational cohorts based solely on plant records, since the company files themselves may not be 100% complete. This article presents a method of verification based on IRS records which is completely independent of company-held records. The sensitivity and effectiveness of the method are demonstrated through the application of the verification scheme to an ongoing study of man-made mineral fiber workers in the United States. In six participating plants, 1990 (21.4% of the original cohort) additional records were uncovered following an initial verification and a second complete survey of plant files. It is believed that, without independent verification, errors of this magnitude may be present in many historical prospective studies of this type. An independent verification should be incorporated into all occupational study designs which utilize historical plant records as the primary data base.
为职业病历史前瞻性研究确定的队列完整性存在多种误差来源,包括文书疏忽或过失以及公司记录保存不善的做法。仅根据工厂记录无法核实职业队列的完整性,因为公司档案本身可能并非100%完整。本文提出了一种基于美国国税局记录的核实方法,该方法完全独立于公司持有的记录。通过将核实方案应用于美国正在进行的人造矿物纤维工人研究,证明了该方法的敏感性和有效性。在六家参与的工厂中,经过初步核实和对工厂档案的第二次全面调查后,发现了1990份(占原始队列的21.4%)额外记录。据信,如果没有独立核实,许多此类历史前瞻性研究可能存在这种程度的误差。所有以历史工厂记录作为主要数据库的职业研究设计都应纳入独立核实。