Alleyne S I, Morrison E Y, Richards R R
Diabetes Care. 1979 Sep-Oct;2(5):401-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.2.5.401.
A population of 103 adult diabetic patients was interviewed at the Outpatient Clinic for diabetic patients of the University Hospital of the West Indies to examine the effects of severity of the illness and social variables, such as facilities at home, education attained, employment status, informal medication, and understanding of the illness in relation to its control. Patients were classified as severe if there were clinical evidence of vascular or neurologic complications of diabetes and as mild if there were no complications. Control of diabetes was regarded as good if the patients were free from or had less than 2+ glycosuria and as poor if they had had 2+ or more glycosuria during the six months before the study. We found that the quality of control was mainly determined by the severity of the disease. In the mild diabetic, proper diabetic control was not influenced by any social variable examined. In the severe diabetic the quality of control was associated with social amenities, educational status, employment status, and understanding of the disease.
在西印度群岛大学医院糖尿病患者门诊对103名成年糖尿病患者进行了访谈,以研究疾病严重程度和社会变量的影响,这些社会变量包括家庭设施、受教育程度、就业状况、非正规药物治疗以及对疾病控制的理解。如果有糖尿病血管或神经并发症的临床证据,则将患者分类为重症;如果没有并发症,则分类为轻症。如果患者没有或仅有少于2+的糖尿,则认为糖尿病控制良好;如果在研究前六个月内有2+或更多的糖尿,则认为控制不佳。我们发现,控制质量主要由疾病严重程度决定。在轻度糖尿病患者中,适当的糖尿病控制不受所检查的任何社会变量影响。在重度糖尿病患者中,控制质量与社会便利设施、教育状况、就业状况以及对疾病的理解有关。