Peters F, Pingoud A
Int J Biomed Comput. 1979 Sep;10(5):401-15. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(79)90054-0.
It is shown on theoretical grounds that the straightforward analysis of binding data according to Scatchard may lead to erroneous results, especially when more complicated binding schemes are involved. We have demonstrated this point by presenting Scatchard plots with slight variation of experimental parameters. These inherent difficulties of Scatchard analyses can be avoided by applying a direct procedure. We have developed a program, which compares the measured quantity and the theoretical value directly and which considers the following binding models: (i) independent equivalent binding of n ligands; (ii) independent unequivalent binding of 2 ligands; (iii) positive or negative cooperative binding of 2 ligands. Other binding schemes can easily be implemented. We have used this procedure for the evaluation of equilibrium data on the complex formation of tRNA-Tyr and tyrolyl tRNA synthetase from E. coli in terms of different binding models.
从理论依据来看,根据斯卡查德方程对结合数据进行直接分析可能会导致错误结果,尤其是当涉及更复杂的结合模式时。我们通过展示实验参数稍有变化时的斯卡查德图来证明了这一点。通过应用一种直接方法可以避免斯卡查德分析的这些固有困难。我们开发了一个程序,它直接比较测量值和理论值,并考虑以下结合模型:(i) n个配体的独立等效结合;(ii) 2个配体的独立不等效结合;(iii) 2个配体的正协同或负协同结合。其他结合模式也可以很容易地实现。我们已使用此程序根据不同的结合模型来评估大肠杆菌中tRNA-Tyr与酪氨酰-tRNA合成酶形成复合物的平衡数据。