Mungas D M, Trontel E H, Winegardner J, Brown D S, Sweeney T M, Walters H A
J Clin Psychol. 1979 Oct;35(4):822-32. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197910)35:4<822::aid-jclp2270350429>3.0.co;2-7.
Reported two studies that examined the efficacy of the Personality Research Form (PRF) as an outcome measure for interventions designed to increase social competence. In the first study (N = 83), the degree to which PRF scales can predict criteria frequently used in social skills training outcome research was examined, and the PRF was shown to be sensitive to such criteria. The second study (N = 24) assessed the relative degree to which the PRF scales and more frequently used outcome measures, including the above criteria, are affected by factors non-specific to social skills training interventions (suggestion for improvement). While three PRF scales were affected significantly, demand effects were much more pervasive on the other measures, which suggests that those measures can be used to obtain valid estimates of treatment effects only when experimental control of non-specific effects is possible. Two PRF scales, Affiliation and Exhibition, were shown to be both sensitive to criteria and resistant to demand effects, and as such may be useful as outcome measures in non-controlled clinical settings.
报告了两项研究,这些研究检验了人格研究表(PRF)作为旨在提高社交能力的干预措施的结果测量指标的有效性。在第一项研究(N = 83)中,检验了PRF量表能够预测社交技能训练结果研究中常用标准的程度,结果表明PRF对这些标准敏感。第二项研究(N = 24)评估了PRF量表以及包括上述标准在内的更常用的结果测量指标受社交技能训练干预非特异性因素(改进建议)影响的相对程度。虽然三个PRF量表受到显著影响,但需求效应在其他测量指标上更为普遍,这表明只有在能够对非特异性效应进行实验控制时,那些测量指标才能用于获得有效的治疗效果估计。两个PRF量表,即亲和性和表现欲量表,既对标准敏感又对需求效应有抵抗力,因此在非对照临床环境中作为结果测量指标可能有用。