• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估感音神经性听力损失的NU-6和W-22言语辨别测试的比较

A comparison of the NU-6 and W-22 speech discrimination tests for assessing sensorineural hearing loss.

作者信息

Orchik D J, Krygier K M, Cutts B P

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Nov;44(4):522-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.522.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.4404.522
PMID:513675
Abstract

The Auditec recordings of the CID W-22 and NU-6 word lists were administered to 30 adults having sensorineural hearing losses. Speech discrimination scores for both tests were obtained at 16, 24, and 32 dB sensation level. Results suggest that both tests differentiate sensorineural-impaired subjects from normal listeners, although scores were significantly better for the W-22 word lists at all sensation levels. Implications for the clinical use of these measures are discussed.

摘要

对30名患有感音神经性听力损失的成年人进行了CID W-22和NU-6单词表的Auditec录音测试。在16、24和32分贝感觉级下获得了两项测试的言语辨别分数。结果表明,两项测试都能将感音神经性受损受试者与正常听力者区分开来,尽管在所有感觉级下,W-22单词表的分数明显更高。文中讨论了这些测量方法在临床应用中的意义。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the NU-6 and W-22 speech discrimination tests for assessing sensorineural hearing loss.用于评估感音神经性听力损失的NU-6和W-22言语辨别测试的比较
J Speech Hear Disord. 1979 Nov;44(4):522-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.522.
2
A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.采用随机呈现水平范式,对听力正常的年轻听众和患有感音神经性听力损失的老年听众在西北大学听觉测试第6号的Auditec和退伍军人事务部(VA)录制版本上的单词识别表现进行比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 May;30(5):370-395. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17135. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
The effect of word list and talker variation on word recognition scores using time-altered speech.使用变速语音时,词表和说话者变化对单词识别分数的影响。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1981 May;46(2):213-6. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4602.213.
4
Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.CID W-22和NU听力测试第6号的心理测量函数。由同一说话者说出的材料。
Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):430-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00008.
5
Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.单音节词的阈值、斜率和PB最大值的可靠性。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 May;50(2):166-78. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5002.166.
6
Slope characteristics of CID W-22 word functions in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.老年听力受损听众中CID W-22词汇功能的斜率特征
J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 May;48(2):119-27. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4802.119.
7
Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.针对正常听力和听力受损受试者,在多说话者噪声环境下进行CID W - 22测试的单词识别功能。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):20-32. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5401.20.
8
Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
Ear Hear. 1984 Mar-Apr;5(2):96-100. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198403000-00007.
9
Word recognition performance with modified CID W-22 word lists.使用改良的CID W-22单词列表进行的单词识别性能。
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Sep;28(3):355-62. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.355.
10
Comparison of the Auditec and Rintelmann recordings of the NU-6.Auditec和Rintelmann对NU-6的录音比较。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 Aug;49(3):267-71. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4903.267.