• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对正常听力和听力受损受试者,在多说话者噪声环境下进行CID W - 22测试的单词识别功能。

Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

作者信息

Beattie R C

机构信息

California State University, Long Beach.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):20-32. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5401.20.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.5401.20
PMID:2915523
Abstract

Word recognition functions for Auditec recordings of the CID W-22 stimuli in multitalker noise were obtained using subjects with normal hearing and with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. In the first experiment, word recognition functions were generated by varying the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N); whereas in the second experiment, a constant S/N was used and stimulus intensity was varied. The split-half reliability of word recognition scores for the normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups revealed variability that agreed closely with predictions based on the simple binomial distribution. Therefore, the binomial model appears appropriate for estimating the variability of word recognition scores whether they are obtained in quiet or in a competing background noise. The reliability for threshold (50% point) revealed good stability. The slope of the recognition function was steeper for normal listeners than for the hearing-impaired subjects. Word recognition testing in noise can provide insight into the problems imposed by hearing loss, particularly when evaluating patients with mild hearing loss who exhibit no difficulties with conventional tests. Clinicians should employ a sufficient number of stimuli so that the test is adequately sensitive to differences among listening conditions.

摘要

针对在多说话者噪声环境下CID W - 22刺激的Auditec录音,使用听力正常以及轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的受试者获得了单词识别功能。在第一个实验中,通过改变信噪比(S/N)来生成单词识别功能;而在第二个实验中,使用恒定的S/N并改变刺激强度。正常听力组和听力受损组单词识别分数的分半信度显示出的变异性与基于简单二项分布的预测结果非常吻合。因此,无论单词识别分数是在安静环境还是在有竞争背景噪声的环境中获得,二项式模型似乎都适用于估计其变异性。阈值(50%点)的信度显示出良好的稳定性。正常听力者的识别函数斜率比听力受损受试者的更陡。在噪声环境中进行单词识别测试可以深入了解听力损失所带来的问题,特别是在评估那些在传统测试中没有困难的轻度听力损失患者时。临床医生应采用足够数量的刺激,以便测试对不同听力条件之间的差异具有足够的敏感性。

相似文献

1
Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.针对正常听力和听力受损受试者,在多说话者噪声环境下进行CID W - 22测试的单词识别功能。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):20-32. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5401.20.
2
Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.安静和嘈杂环境下单音节词的正常及听力受损者的单词识别分数。
Br J Audiol. 1997 Jun;31(3):153-64. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000018.
3
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.
4
A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).在多说话者嘈杂环境中两项单词识别任务的比较:噪声中的语音识别测试(SPRINT)和噪声中的单词测试(WIN)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;19(7):548-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.4.
5
A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.采用随机呈现水平范式,对听力正常的年轻听众和患有感音神经性听力损失的老年听众在西北大学听觉测试第6号的Auditec和退伍军人事务部(VA)录制版本上的单词识别表现进行比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 May;30(5):370-395. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17135. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
6
Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.单音节词的阈值、斜率和PB最大值的可靠性。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1985 May;50(2):166-78. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5002.166.
7
Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners.老年听力受损听众的实际和预测单词识别表现。
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):636-42. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.636.
8
Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.在高于正常的语音和噪音水平下对单音节词的识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Apr;105(4):2431-44. doi: 10.1121/1.426848.
9
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.在测量听力努力的双任务范式中改变次要任务的效果。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
10
Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.正常听力和感音神经性听力损失中的语音识别与频谱通道数量的关系。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Nov;120(5 Pt 1):2908-25. doi: 10.1121/1.2354017.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.口罩对言语理解的影响:言语测听中的临床视角
J Otol. 2022 Jul;17(3):140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
On the Difference of Scoring in Speech in Babble Tests.关于咿呀学语测试中言语评分的差异
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;10(3):458. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030458.
3
Word Recognition and Learning: Effects of Hearing Loss and Amplification Feature.词汇识别与学习:听力损失和助听特性的影响。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517709597. doi: 10.1177/2331216517709597.
4
Speech recognition in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.感音神经性听力损失患者的语音识别
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey.言语可懂度心理物理函数斜率的变化:系统调查。
Trends Hear. 2014 Jun 6;18:2331216514537722. doi: 10.1177/2331216514537722.
6
Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.对成人人工耳蜗植入受者的TIMIT句子列表等效性评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 May;23(5):313-31. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.3.
7
Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in children: past and current perspectives.儿童单侧及轻度双侧听力损失:过去与当前的观点
Trends Amplif. 2008 Mar;12(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/1084713807304668.