Berki S E, Ashcraft M L
Med Care. 1979 Dec;17(12):1163-81.
After separating ambulatory visits into those made in connection with illness or injury and preventive visits, the utilization patterns of a sample of families and individuals are analyzed. Need, in terms of perceived health status and the numbers of acute and chronic conditions, price, and access are found to be the best predictors of visit rates, but their roles in illness and preventive visit rates are different. The methodologically relevant findings indicate that individual self-reports and independent individual observations are required to identify relationships hidden by family member data, such as that between hospital episodes and ambulatory visits. The substantive findings indicate a substitutive relationship between illness and preventive visits, lend further evidence for relatively low price elasticity for illness visits and show that membership in a closed panel health maintenance organization increases preventive visit rate while price has little or no effect on it. The tentative policy implication--that it is not so much price as the characteristics of the usual source of care which appear to determine preventive services utilization--is discussed in the context of potential biases inherent in the sample.
将门诊就诊分为与疾病或损伤相关的就诊和预防性就诊后,对一个家庭和个人样本的利用模式进行了分析。研究发现,从感知健康状况、急慢性病数量、价格和可及性方面来看,需求是就诊率的最佳预测指标,但它们在疾病就诊率和预防性就诊率中的作用有所不同。方法学上的相关发现表明,需要个体自我报告和独立的个体观察来识别被家庭成员数据掩盖的关系,如住院次数和门诊就诊之间的关系。实质性发现表明疾病就诊和预防性就诊之间存在替代关系,进一步证明了疾病就诊的价格弹性相对较低,并表明加入封闭式健康维护组织会提高预防性就诊率,而价格对其影响很小或没有影响。在样本固有潜在偏差的背景下,讨论了初步的政策含义——似乎决定预防性服务利用的与其说是价格,不如说是常规医疗服务来源的特征。