• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用赖特雾化器和剂量仪进行组胺支气管激发试验的比较。

Comparison of histamine bronchial challenges with the Wright nebulizer and the dosimeter.

作者信息

Beaupré A, Malo J L

出版信息

Clin Allergy. 1979 Nov;9(6):575-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb00482.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb00482.x
PMID:519838
Abstract

In twenty adult asthmatics studied in a stable state, histamine bronchial challenges were carried out at one-week intervals with the Wright nebulizer and with the dosimeter-DeVilbiss apparatus. Dose-response curves were analysed for sensitivity, defined as the minimal histamine dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), and for reactivity, defined as the slope of the dose-response curve once the reaction starts to occur. A significant relationship (r=0.80) was found for the sensitivity obtained with the two nebulizers. PC20 was indeed reproducible within a two folds concentration of histamine in sixteen of the twenty patients. A significant difference (P less than 0.01) was found in the reactivity to the two different apparatus, reactivity being greater with the Wright nebulizer in twelve out of fifteen patients so tested. Sensitivity and reactivity showed a borderline relationship (r=0.47) with the Wright nebulizer but not with the dosimeter. A significant correlation (P less than 0.05) was found to exist between the initial FEV1 (in % of the predicted value) and the observed sensitivity and reactivity as assessed with the Wright nebulizer, but not as assessed with the dosimeter. We conclude that histamine bronchial challenges with the Wright nebulizer and with the dosimeter yield reproducible results if the threshold of a 20% fall in FEV1 is taken as positive. However, the two methods produce different results in terms of reactivity.

摘要

在对20名处于稳定状态的成年哮喘患者进行的研究中,使用赖特雾化器和剂量计-德维比斯仪器每隔一周进行一次组胺支气管激发试验。分析剂量反应曲线的敏感性,定义为导致第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)下降20%的最小组胺剂量(PC20),以及反应性,定义为反应开始发生后剂量反应曲线的斜率。发现两种雾化器获得的敏感性之间存在显著相关性(r=0.80)。在20名患者中的16名患者中,PC20在组胺浓度两倍范围内确实具有可重复性。发现对两种不同仪器的反应性存在显著差异(P小于0.01),在接受测试的15名患者中,有12名患者使用赖特雾化器时反应性更高。敏感性和反应性与赖特雾化器呈临界相关性(r=0.47),但与剂量计无关。发现初始FEV1(占预测值的百分比)与使用赖特雾化器评估的观察到的敏感性和反应性之间存在显著相关性(P小于0.05),但与使用剂量计评估的情况无关。我们得出结论,如果将FEV1下降20%的阈值视为阳性,使用赖特雾化器和剂量计进行组胺支气管激发试验可产生可重复的结果。然而,两种方法在反应性方面产生不同的结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of histamine bronchial challenges with the Wright nebulizer and the dosimeter.使用赖特雾化器和剂量仪进行组胺支气管激发试验的比较。
Clin Allergy. 1979 Nov;9(6):575-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb00482.x.
2
A comparison of histamine and methacholine bronchial challenges using the DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer and the Rosenthal-French dosimeter.使用德维比斯646雾化器和罗森塔尔-弗伦奇剂量计对组胺和乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验的比较。
Br J Dis Chest. 1987 Jul;81(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(87)90158-6.
3
Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma.在成年哮喘患者中,比较AeroEclipse II呼吸驱动雾化器与Wright雾化器使第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)下降20%时的乙酰甲胆碱激发浓度。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jul;12(7):1039-43. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201412-571BC.
4
Measurement of PC20 histamine with the use of two different nebulizers and measurement of FEV1 and PEF.使用两种不同的雾化器测量PC20组胺,并测量第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼气峰流速(PEF)。
Allergy. 1991 Apr;46(3):213-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1991.tb00573.x.
5
Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:振动网式雾化器与射流雾化器产生的气道反应性比较。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Apr;31(2):88-93. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2017.1392. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
6
Methacholine Challenge Testing: A Novel Method for Measuring PD.乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:一种测量帕金森病的新方法。
Chest. 2017 Dec;152(6):1251-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Slope of the dose-response curve: usefulness in assessing bronchial responses to inhaled histamine.剂量反应曲线的斜率:在评估支气管对吸入组胺反应中的作用。
Thorax. 1983 Jan;38(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.1.55.
8
Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response.哮喘中组胺剂量反应曲线:评估反应的不同指标的可重复性和敏感性
Thorax. 1983 Jul;38(7):516-22. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.7.516.
9
Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: relevance of the distinction between PC20 and reactivity in characterising clinical state.哮喘中的组胺剂量反应曲线:PC20与反应性的区别在表征临床状态方面的相关性。
Thorax. 1981 Oct;36(10):731-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.10.731.
10
Histamine log(dose)-response curves in asthmatics. A comparison between the Wiesbadener Doppelinhalator and the De Vilbiss Model 645 nebulizer.哮喘患者的组胺对数剂量反应曲线。威斯巴登双筒雾化器与德维比斯645型雾化器的比较。
Respiration. 1985;47(4):278-84. doi: 10.1159/000194783.

引用本文的文献

1
Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: relevance of the distinction between PC20 and reactivity in characterising clinical state.哮喘中的组胺剂量反应曲线:PC20与反应性的区别在表征临床状态方面的相关性。
Thorax. 1981 Oct;36(10):731-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.10.731.
2
Challenge procedures in occupational asthma.职业性哮喘的激发试验程序
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1981 Sep;57(7):608-16.
3
Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness.测量支气管反应性的快速方法。
Thorax. 1983 Oct;38(10):760-5. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.10.760.
4
Methacholine bronchial challenge using a dosimeter with controlled tidal breathing.使用带有控制潮气量呼吸的剂量计进行乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验。
Thorax. 1988 Nov;43(11):896-900. doi: 10.1136/thx.43.11.896.
5
Measurement of bronchial responsiveness.支气管反应性的测量。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1989 Fall;7(3):279-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02914479.
6
Bronchial provocation tests with pharmacological agents.
Clin Rev Allergy. 1990 Summer-Fall;8(2-3):129-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02914441.