Thompson E A, Cannings C
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979;32:363-82.
Previous approaches to the ascertainment problem have been in terms of a registry-type situation in which the sampled structure is a random variable. However, with the exception of Bailey (1951), previous authors have conditioned on this structure. In extending the theory to pedigrees, a registry situation may also be considered, providing neither the structure nor any part of it (e.g., ages of individuals) are conditioned upon, but it may often be neither practicable nor relevant to do so. In many studies the sampling scheme may fix the number of pedigrees, analyzed, and classical "ascertainment probabilities" are no longer applicable. In an infinite population, in which the ascertainment of and phenotypic observations on, affect neither the distribution of other ascertainments or phenotypic distributions on other pedigrees and chance multiple ascertainments cannot occur, ascertainment corrections are relatively straightforward. However, effective population sizes with regard to particular rare traits may often be small, and the problem of ascertainment corrections in this case has not been fully analyzed, although some preliminary results are presented.
以往解决确定问题的方法是基于一种登记类型的情况,其中抽样结构是一个随机变量。然而,除了贝利(1951年)之外,以往的作者都以这种结构为条件。在将该理论扩展到系谱时,也可以考虑登记情况,前提是既不以结构也不以其任何部分(例如个体年龄)为条件,但这样做往往既不可行也不相关。在许多研究中,抽样方案可能会确定所分析的系谱数量,经典的“确定概率”不再适用。在一个无限总体中,对其进行确定和表型观察既不影响其他确定的分布,也不影响其他系谱上的表型分布,且不会出现偶然的多重确定,确定校正相对简单。然而,就特定罕见性状而言,有效种群大小往往较小,尽管给出了一些初步结果,但在这种情况下确定校正问题尚未得到充分分析。