Walker T L, Redding R W, Braund K G
Am J Vet Res. 1979 Oct;40(10):1433-9.
Supramaximal percutaneous nerve stimulation was used in motor nerve conduction velocity studies conducted in ten middle-aged, clinically normal dogs. Dogs were separated into two groups; dogs in one group weighted less than or equal to 7.5 kg and dogs in the other group weighted greater than or equal to 15.9 kg. Mean values and SEM were recorded for radial (72.1 +/- 1.9 m/s), median 65.6 +/- 2.1 m/s), ulnar (58.9 +/- 1.0 m/s), tibial (68.2 +/- 1.4 m/s), and peroneal (79.8 +/- 1.8 m/s) nerves. Values for latency, amplitude, and duration for proximal and distal evoked potentials were recorded. Analysis of mean nerve conduction velocity values for all nerves between the two groups indicated no statistical difference (P greater than 0.05). However, the two groups were statistically different (P less than 0.05) when values for distal latency and measurements of nerve length were compared. These data suggest that if latency is substituted for velocity measurements, various populations of dogs must be considered to clarify interpretation.
在对10只临床正常的中年犬进行的运动神经传导速度研究中,采用了超强经皮神经刺激。将犬分为两组;一组犬体重小于或等于7.5千克,另一组犬体重大于或等于15.9千克。记录了桡神经(72.1±1.9米/秒)、正中神经(65.6±2.1米/秒)、尺神经(58.9±1.0米/秒)、胫神经(68.2±1.4米/秒)和腓神经(79.8±1.8米/秒)的平均值和标准误。记录了近端和远端诱发电位的潜伏期、波幅和时限值。对两组所有神经的平均神经传导速度值进行分析,结果显示无统计学差异(P>0.05)。然而,当比较远端潜伏期值和神经长度测量值时,两组存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。这些数据表明,如果用潜伏期替代速度测量,必须考虑不同群体的犬以明确解释结果。