Partadiredja M, Eidson C S, Kleven S H
Avian Dis. 1979 Jul-Sep;23(3):622-33.
One-day-old broiler chicks from 4 groups of broiler breeder chickens were immunized by different methods of vaccination: 1) aerosol; 2) intratracheal; 3) drinking water; or 4) unvaccinated. The breeder flock from which the chicks were derived was vaccinated by one of the following methods: 1) a single injection of an oil-emulsion Newcastle disease virus (NDV) vaccine; 2) two vaccinations with oil-emulsion NDV vaccine; 3) vaccination with a live NDV vaccine; and 4) unvaccinated controls. Aerosol vaccination induced higher serologic responses than water and intratracheal vaccination, as well as giving the highest levels of protection against challenge. Mortality ranged from 20% to 66% in all eight groups of birds vaccinated intratracheally and challenged at 6 weeks of age. Results of challenge tests, in agreement with results of HI tests, further demonstrated that intratracheal vaccination at one day of age does not elicit a satisfactory immune response in birds with a maternal antibody titer of 15 or higher.
选取来自4组肉种鸡的1日龄肉仔鸡,采用不同的疫苗接种方法进行免疫:1)气雾免疫;2)气管内接种;3)饮水免疫;4)不接种疫苗。这些雏鸡所来自的种鸡群采用以下方法之一进行接种:1)单次注射油乳剂新城疫病毒(NDV)疫苗;2)两次接种油乳剂NDV疫苗;3)接种活NDV疫苗;4)不接种疫苗作为对照。气雾免疫诱导的血清学反应高于饮水免疫和气管内接种,并且对攻毒的保护水平最高。所有8组在1日龄时进行气管内接种并在6周龄时接受攻毒的鸡的死亡率在20%至66%之间。攻毒试验结果与血凝抑制(HI)试验结果一致,进一步证明,对于母源抗体效价为15或更高的鸡,1日龄时进行气管内接种不能引发令人满意的免疫反应。