Eidson C S, Thayer S G, Villegas P, Kleven S H
Poult Sci. 1982 Aug;61(8):1621-9. doi: 10.3382/ps.0611621.
One-day-old chicks used in this study were from breeder flocks vaccinated with live (B1 and LaSota) or inactivated oil emulsion Newcastle disease (ND) vaccine. Chicks were vaccinated against ND by various procedures. The vaccination response was evaluated by hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titers and by challenge. Chicks from breeder flocks vaccinated with live virus vaccine had a geometric mean hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer (GMT) for Newcastle of 7 (low maternal antibody titer) at 1 day of age, whereas those chickens derived from breeder flocks vaccinated with inactivated oil emulsion ND vaccine had a GMT of 84 (high maternal antibody titer). One-day-old chicks injected with live B1 vaccine were not immunized against ND regardless of breeder flock source. However, chickens with low maternal antibody titers were effectively immunized against ND when injected at 1 day of age with an inactivated or inactivated plus live ND vaccine. Chicks with high maternal antibody titers were not effectively protected when vaccinated with inactivated vaccine at 1 day of age; however, these chicks were protected when injected with a combined live and inactivated ND vaccine. Chicks from both breeder flocks were effectively immunized against ND when injected at 1 day of age with a live or inactivated ND vaccine and revaccinated by aerosol at 21 days of age with live B1 ND vaccine. Even though they were protected against ND, there appears to have been an interference phenomenon in chicks derived from breeder flocks vaccinated with the live ND vaccine. Beak-O-Vac vaccinated chickens were not effectively protected against ND when compared with chicks vaccinated by aerosol at 1 day of age. Water vaccination at 7, 14, or 21 days of age was as effective as aerosol vaccination when administered to chicks with low maternal antibody titers. However, water vaccination was not as effective as aerosol vaccination when administered to chicks with high maternal antibody titers.
本研究中使用的一日龄雏鸡来自接种过活疫苗(B1和LaSota)或灭活油乳剂新城疫(ND)疫苗的种鸡群。雏鸡通过各种程序接种ND疫苗。通过血凝抑制抗体滴度和攻毒来评估疫苗接种反应。来自接种活病毒疫苗的种鸡群的雏鸡在1日龄时新城疫的几何平均血凝抑制抗体滴度(GMT)为7(母源抗体滴度低),而来自接种灭活油乳剂ND疫苗的种鸡群的雏鸡GMT为84(母源抗体滴度高)。无论种鸡群来源如何,注射活B1疫苗的一日龄雏鸡均未获得针对ND的免疫。然而,母源抗体滴度低的鸡在1日龄时注射灭活或灭活加活ND疫苗可有效获得针对ND的免疫。母源抗体滴度高的雏鸡在1日龄接种灭活疫苗时未得到有效保护;然而,这些雏鸡在注射活疫苗和灭活疫苗联合的ND疫苗时得到了保护。来自两个种鸡群的雏鸡在1日龄时注射活或灭活ND疫苗,并在21日龄时通过气溶胶再次接种活B1 ND疫苗,均能有效获得针对ND的免疫。尽管它们对ND有保护作用,但在来自接种活ND疫苗的种鸡群的雏鸡中似乎存在干扰现象。与1日龄通过气溶胶接种疫苗的雏鸡相比,经喙部接种疫苗的鸡对ND未得到有效保护。在7、14或21日龄进行饮水免疫,对于母源抗体滴度低的雏鸡,其效果与气溶胶免疫相同。然而,对于母源抗体滴度高的雏鸡,饮水免疫不如气溶胶免疫有效。