Dawson J J, Devadatta S, Fox W, Radhakrishna S, Ramakrishnan C V, Somasundaram P R, Stott H, Tripathy S P, Velu S
Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34(4):533-51.
This report from the Tuberculosis Chemotherapy Centre, Madras, summarizes the progress over a 5-year period of 193 patients with newly diagnosed, sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis who were admitted to a concurrent comparison of home and sanatorium treatment for one year with isoniazid plus PAS. Previous reports have shown that, despite the traditional advantages of sanatorium treatment-rest, adequate diet, nursing and supervised drug-administration-the home patients responded nearly as well as the sanatorium patients in the first year; further, the relapse rates over a 2-year period of follow-up were similar. The findings in the present report are based on a 4-year period of follow-up and extend these conclusions, the relapse rates over the period being 7% for the home patients and 10% for the sanatorium patients.Patients who failed to respond to treatment in the first year and those who had a bacteriological relapse in the second or subsequent years were usually re-treated with reserve regimens, first with streptomycin plus pyrazinamide and, if this was ineffective, with cycloserine plus ethionamide. Considering the findings over the entire 5-year period, five home patients and three sanatorium patients died from non-tuberculous causes. Of the remainder, 5% of the home patients and 6% of the sanatorium patients died of tuberculosis, 4% in each series had bacteriologically active disease at five years and 90% and 89%, respectively, had bacteriologically quiescent disease at that time. These findings are very encouraging, particularly for developing countries such as India, where tuberculosis is a major problem and sanatorium beds are very few.
这份来自马德拉斯结核病化疗中心的报告总结了193例新诊断出痰菌阳性的肺结核患者在5年期间的治疗进展。这些患者同时接受了为期一年的家庭治疗和疗养院治疗对比,治疗方案为异烟肼加对氨基水杨酸。先前的报告显示,尽管疗养院治疗具有传统优势——休息、充足饮食、护理和监督用药,但第一年家庭治疗组患者的治疗效果与疗养院治疗组患者相近;此外,在两年的随访期内,两组的复发率相似。本报告的研究结果基于4年的随访期,并扩展了这些结论,在此期间家庭治疗组患者的复发率为7%,疗养院治疗组患者为10%。第一年治疗无反应以及在第二年或之后出现细菌学复发的患者通常采用备用方案重新治疗,首先使用链霉素加吡嗪酰胺,如果无效,则使用环丝氨酸加乙硫异烟胺。考虑到整个5年期间的研究结果,5名接受家庭治疗的患者和3名接受疗养院治疗的患者死于非结核性原因。其余患者中,5%的家庭治疗组患者和6%的疗养院治疗组患者死于结核病,两组各有4%的患者在5年时仍有细菌学活动性疾病,当时分别有90%和89%的患者细菌学检查呈静止状态。这些结果非常令人鼓舞,特别是对于像印度这样结核病是主要问题且疗养院床位很少的发展中国家。