Macfadyen D M, Heffernan J F
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;36(5):847-52.
Testing urine specimens obtained at surprise visits to the home or at routine clinic attendance is an established procedure in the supervision of patients receiving ambulatory chemotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis. A urine test service was set up in 9 East African centres, involving 37 staff members (most with limited training) who conducted a simple paper test for isoniazid. Analysis of the results obtained yielded an unbelievably high proportion of positive results, indicating that the testing system, as organized, had been a failure. Special investigations were therefore carried out into the reasons for this.Over-reading of test results, incorrect performance of the test, and, in 1 centre, dishonest recording were found as explanations. Discussing the implications of their findings, the authors stress the importance of close supervision at all stages of tuberculosis-control procedures in the field, no matter how simple; and they point out with reference to urine testing that, even if a centralized testing system, involving a sensitive test method and quality control, were to be set up in regional laboratories, adequate supervision at all stages would be essential.
对接受肺结核门诊化疗的患者进行监督时,在突击家访或常规门诊时采集尿液样本进行检测是一种既定程序。在东非的9个中心设立了尿液检测服务,涉及37名工作人员(大多数培训有限),他们进行了一项简单的异烟肼纸质检测。对所得结果的分析显示阳性结果比例高得惊人,这表明所组织的检测系统是失败的。因此,对造成这种情况的原因进行了专门调查。发现原因包括对检测结果的过度解读、检测操作不当,以及在1个中心存在不诚实记录的情况。在讨论研究结果的影响时,作者强调在实地结核病控制程序的各个阶段进行密切监督的重要性,无论多么简单;他们还指出,就尿液检测而言,即使在区域实验室建立一个采用灵敏检测方法并进行质量控制的集中检测系统,各个阶段的充分监督也是必不可少的。