Melikova E N, Lesnjak S V
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(4):575-9.
International collaborative laboratory studies on the International Reference Preparations of Typhoid Vaccine have so far failed to provide data on which international units for these vaccines can be based. Further assays carried out using the active mouse protection test, with immunization by the subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intravenous route, confirmed the findings by some workers that the International Reference Preparation of Typhoid Vaccine (Acetone-Inactivated) (vaccine K) was more effective than the International Reference Preparation of Typhoid Vaccine (Heat-Phenol-Inactivated) (vaccine L), and indicated that intraperitoneal immunization was the most promising method. Vaccine K, together with the material extracted by the acetone in the preparation of the vaccine, had a significantly lower effectiveness (at the 5% probability level) only when intraperitoneal immunization was used. The reasons for the differences found between the various vaccines and routes of immunization are discussed at length.It is suggested that challenge with a strain of Salmonella moscow instead of the strain of Salm. typhi used until now gives a true infection and forms the basis of a reliable method for the potency assay of typhoid vaccines.
迄今为止,关于伤寒疫苗国际参考制剂的国际协作实验室研究未能提供可据此确定这些疫苗国际单位的数据。使用活性小鼠保护试验进行的进一步检测,通过皮下、腹腔或静脉途径进行免疫,证实了一些研究人员的发现,即伤寒疫苗国际参考制剂(丙酮灭活)(疫苗K)比伤寒疫苗国际参考制剂(热酚灭活)(疫苗L)更有效,并表明腹腔免疫是最有前景的方法。仅在使用腹腔免疫时,疫苗K与疫苗制备过程中丙酮提取的物质相比,有效性显著降低(在5%概率水平)。文中详细讨论了不同疫苗和免疫途径之间差异的原因。建议使用莫斯科沙门氏菌菌株而非迄今为止使用的伤寒沙门氏菌菌株进行攻毒,可产生真正的感染,并构成伤寒疫苗效价测定可靠方法的基础。