Cooper P R, Maravilla K, Moody S, Clark W K
Neurosurgery. 1979 Nov;5(5):566-9. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197911000-00004.
Serial (two or three) computerized tomographic (CT) scans were performed on a series of 58 patients with severe head injury. The protocol called for scans to be done upon admission and on Days 3 and 7 after injury. New lesions (i.e., lesions not visualized on the initial CT scans but appearing on subsequent scans) were a frequent finding, occurring in over half of all patients. For the purposes of this study a new lesion was classified as edema involving two or more lobes, extra-axial hematoma, parenchymal hemorrhage, or infarction. Significant correlation was found between good outcome and the absence of new lesions and between bad outcome and the development of new lesions (p less than 0.001). Several patients did well in spite of the development of new lesions, but these patients were unique in that most had small, unilateral parenchymal hematomas located at or near the frontal or temporal poles. In most cases, patients who did poorly in spite of not developing new lesions had severe injuried visualized on their initial scans (massive intracerebral hematoma, hemorrhage of the corpus callosum) or succumbed to medical complications. The pertinent literature is reviewed, and other CT findings associated with a poor prognosis are noted. The authors suggest that serial CT scanning may be used to make prognostic assessments in severely head-injured patients and may be of value in increasing the confidence in and accuracy of assessments made on clinical grounds alone. (Neurosurgery, 5: 566--569, 1979).
对58例重度颅脑损伤患者进行了系列(两次或三次)计算机断层扫描(CT)。扫描方案要求在入院时以及受伤后的第3天和第7天进行扫描。新病灶(即在初次CT扫描中未显示但在后续扫描中出现的病灶)是常见的发现,超过半数的患者都有新病灶。在本研究中,新病灶被分类为累及两个或更多脑叶的水肿、轴外血肿、实质内出血或梗死。结果良好与无新病灶之间以及结果不良与新病灶的出现之间存在显著相关性(p小于0.001)。尽管有新病灶出现,但仍有几名患者恢复良好,但这些患者的独特之处在于,大多数患者有位于额叶或颞叶极或其附近的小的单侧实质内血肿。在大多数情况下,尽管没有出现新病灶但预后较差的患者在初次扫描时就有严重损伤(巨大脑内血肿、胼胝体出血)或死于医学并发症。对相关文献进行了综述,并指出了其他与预后不良相关的CT表现。作者认为,系列CT扫描可用于对重度颅脑损伤患者进行预后评估,并且可能有助于提高仅基于临床做出的评估的可信度和准确性。(《神经外科学》,第5卷:566 - 569页,1979年)