Lobato R D, Gomez P A, Alday R, Rivas J J, Dominguez J, Cabrera A, Turanzas F S, Benitez A, Rivero B
Service of Neurosurgery, Hospital 12 Octubre, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(5):385-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01808871.
The authors analysed the serial computerized tomography (CT) findings in a large series of severely head injured patients in order to assess the variability in gross intracranial pathology through the acute posttraumatic period and determine the most common patterns of CT change. A second aim was to compare the prognostic significance of the different CT diagnostic categories used in the study (Traumatic Coma Data Bank CT pathological classification) when gleaned either from the initial (postadmission) or the control CT scans, and determine the extent to which having a second CT scan provides more prognostic information than only one scan. 92 patients (13.3% of the total population) died soon after injury. Of the 587 who survived long enough to have at least one control CT scan 23.6% developed new diffuse brain swelling, and 20.9% new focal mass lesions most of which had to be evacuated. The relative risk for requiring a delayed operation as related to the diagnostic category established by using the initial CT scans was by decreasing order: diffuse injury IV (30.7%), diffuse injury III (30.5%), non evacuated mass (20%), evacuated mass (20.2%), diffuse injury II (12.1%), and diffuse injury I (8.6%). Overall, 51.2% of the patients developed significant CT changes (for worse or better) occurring either spontaneously or following surgery, and their final outcomes were more closely related to the control than to the initial CT diagnoses. In fact, the final outcome was more accurately predicted by using the control CT scans (81.2% of the cases) than by using the initial CT scans (71.5% of the cases only). Since the majority of relevant CT changes developed within 48 hours after injury a pathological categorization made by using an early control CT scan seems to be most useful for prognostic purposes. Prognosis associated with the CT pathological categories used in the study was similar independently of the moment of the acute posttraumatic period at which diagnoses were made.
作者分析了大量重度颅脑损伤患者的系列计算机断层扫描(CT)结果,以评估急性创伤后颅内大体病理变化的变异性,并确定CT变化的最常见模式。第二个目的是比较研究中使用的不同CT诊断类别(创伤性昏迷数据库CT病理分类)从初始(入院后)或对照CT扫描中得出时的预后意义,并确定进行第二次CT扫描比仅进行一次扫描能提供更多预后信息的程度。92名患者(占总人口的13.3%)在受伤后不久死亡。在587名存活时间足够长以至少进行一次对照CT扫描的患者中,23.6%出现了新的弥漫性脑肿胀,20.9%出现了新的局灶性肿块病变,其中大多数需要进行手术清除。与使用初始CT扫描确定的诊断类别相关的延迟手术相对风险按降序排列为:弥漫性损伤IV(30.7%)、弥漫性损伤III(30.5%)、未清除的肿块(20%)、已清除的肿块(20.2%)、弥漫性损伤II(12.1%)和弥漫性损伤I(8.6%)。总体而言,51.2%的患者出现了显著的CT变化(变好或变差),这些变化要么自发出现,要么在手术后出现,其最终结局与对照CT扫描的关系比与初始CT诊断的关系更密切。事实上,使用对照CT扫描(81.2%的病例)比使用初始CT扫描(仅71.5%的病例)能更准确地预测最终结局。由于大多数相关的CT变化在受伤后48小时内出现,因此使用早期对照CT扫描进行病理分类似乎对预后评估最有用。与研究中使用的CT病理类别相关的预后相似,与创伤后急性期做出诊断的时间无关。