Ismail M, Draper C, Ouchterlony O, Nilsson L A, Terry R
Parasite Immunol. 1979 Autumn;1(3):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1979.tb00710.x.
A comparison has been made of a new serological method, thin layer immunoassay (TIA), and an established method, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in the detection and quantification of antibodies in schistosomiasis. Using sera from known S. haematobium and S. mansoni cases, the performance of the two tests was almost identical; 95.6% positive for TIA and 96.4% by ELISA. TIA however produced a small number of false positives with sera from other helminth infections whereas ELISA gave none. There was excellent correlation between the tests in the quantification of anti-S. haematobium antibodies, both in human cases and in infected baboons. TIA has the advantage of being extremely simple to perform, but has the disadvantage of requiring a higher concentration of antigens.
对一种新的血清学方法——薄层免疫测定法(TIA)和一种既定方法——酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)在血吸虫病抗体检测和定量方面进行了比较。使用来自已知埃及血吸虫和曼氏血吸虫病例的血清,两种检测方法的表现几乎相同;TIA的阳性率为95.6%,ELISA为96.4%。然而,TIA对其他蠕虫感染血清产生了少量假阳性,而ELISA未出现假阳性。在人类病例和感染狒狒中,两种检测方法在抗埃及血吸虫抗体定量方面具有极好的相关性。TIA具有操作极其简单的优点,但缺点是需要更高浓度的抗原。