Boice R
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977 Jun;91(3):649-61. doi: 10.1037/h0077338.
Burrows dug by albino rats were compared with those of wild Norway rats in an outdoor pen and in observation chambers in the laboratory. Burrows, in terms of measurements, configurations, or sequential development, were indistinguishable in wild and domestic rats. Burrowing for both wild and domestic rats was unaffected by raising in outdoor burrows, by availability of nesting material, or by pregnancy. Prior experience in burrowing did make it more efficient in a second trial, which suggests that learning may have a limited role in what appears to be a behavior with a strong genetic basis. Feralization of domestic rats in the outdoor pen was especially productive in answering claims of degeneracy in these animals: Albino rats were hardy throughout climatic extremes, they maintained a stable population for two years, they constructed and lived in burrows, and they showed a vaiety of wild-type behaviors.
在室外围栏和实验室观察室中,对白化大鼠挖掘的洞穴与野生褐家鼠的洞穴进行了比较。就尺寸、结构或连续发育而言,野生大鼠和家养大鼠的洞穴没有区别。野生大鼠和家养大鼠的打洞行为不受在室外洞穴中饲养、筑巢材料的可获得性或怀孕的影响。在第二次试验中,先前的打洞经验确实使其效率更高,这表明学习在这种似乎具有强大遗传基础的行为中可能只起有限的作用。在室外围栏中将家养大鼠野化,对于回应这些动物退化的说法特别有成效:白化大鼠在极端气候条件下都很耐寒,它们的种群稳定维持了两年,它们建造并居住在洞穴中,并且表现出各种野生型行为。