Suppr超能文献

社交互动能否用于测量焦虑?

Can social interaction be used to measure anxiety?

作者信息

File S E, Hyde J R

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 1978 Jan;62(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1978.tb07001.x.

Abstract

1 Pairs of male rats were placed in a test box for 10 min and the time they spent in active social interaction was scored. Maximum active interaction was found when the rats were tested under low light in a box with which they were familiar. When the light level was increased or when the box was unfamiliar active social interaction decreased. 2 Exploration (time spent sniffing objects) decreased in the same way in relation to test conditions as did social interaction. As these decreased, defecation, and freezing increased. 3 Anosmic controls showed that the decrease in social interaction across test conditions could not be attributed to olfactory changes in the partner. 4 Chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) given chronically prevented or significantly reduced the decrease in social interaction that occurred in undrugged rats as the light level or the unfamiliarity of the test box was increased. Controls showed that this effect could not be entirely attributed to chlordiazepoxide acting selectively to increase low levels of responding. 5 The effect of chronic chlordiazepoxide contrasts with its action when given acutely; in the latter case it has only sedative effects. 6 Whether this test can be used as an animal model of anxiety is discussed and this test is compared with existing tests of anxiety.

摘要
  1. 将雄鼠两两配对放入测试箱中10分钟,并对它们在积极社交互动中花费的时间进行评分。当在光线较暗且它们熟悉的箱子中对大鼠进行测试时,发现其积极互动最为频繁。当光照强度增加或箱子不熟悉时,积极社交互动减少。2. 探索行为(嗅闻物体所花费的时间)与社交互动一样,在测试条件方面以相同方式减少。随着这些行为减少,排便和僵住行为增加。3. 嗅觉缺失的对照组表明,不同测试条件下社交互动的减少不能归因于同伴的嗅觉变化。4. 长期给予氯氮卓(5毫克/千克)可预防或显著减少未用药大鼠在光照强度增加或测试箱不熟悉时出现的社交互动减少。对照组表明,这种作用不能完全归因于氯氮卓选择性地增加低水平反应。5. 氯氮卓长期给药的效果与其急性给药时的作用形成对比;在后一种情况下,它仅具有镇静作用。6. 讨论了该测试是否可作为焦虑症的动物模型,并将该测试与现有的焦虑症测试进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Can social interaction be used to measure anxiety?社交互动能否用于测量焦虑?
Br J Pharmacol. 1978 Jan;62(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1978.tb07001.x.
8
Enhanced choice of familiar food in a food preference test after chlordiazepoxide administration.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Sep 15;59(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00428030.

引用本文的文献

1
as a neurobehavioral model for sex differences in stress response.作为应激反应中性别差异的神经行为模型。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jul 11;19:1581763. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1581763. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

3
Social and nonsocial attraction in rats.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Jun;9(2):142-6. doi: 10.1037/h0025843.
4
Management of the office patient with anxiety and depression.
Psychosomatics. 1965 Sep-Oct;6(5):347-51. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3182(65)72254-8.
5
Acute anosmia in the rat: a behavioral test of a peripherally-induced olfactory deficit.
Physiol Behav. 1971 May;6(5):619-21. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90218-6.
6
The conditioned emotional response (CER) as a baseline for the study of anti-anxiety drugs.
Neuropharmacology. 1974 Jan;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(74)90002-1.
8
Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review.大鼠和小鼠情绪性测试综述
Anim Behav. 1973 May;21(2):205-35. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(73)80065-x.
9
Producing and interpreting experimental olfactory deficits.产生和解释实验性嗅觉缺陷。
Physiol Behav. 1974 Apr;12(4):657-70. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(74)90216-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验