Bebbington P E
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1978 Dec;2(4):297-341. doi: 10.1007/BF00048592.
The concept of depression is reviewed. Depression is defined as a syndrome and thus involves particularly subjective decisions by the diagnostician. The conceptual difficulties which arise from this are outlined. The rate of risk is reviewed, using both studies of treated cases and community interview surveys. The study of treated rates tells more of the variables affecting the process of declaration than of depression. It is proposed that case-finding has the prerequisite of precise case-definition with a standardized instrument. Only then can comparability be reached. The effect sociodemographic variables on rates of risk is analysed: it is concluded that they do not account for much of the variance because they are at best gross measures. The role of life events is assessed and it is argued that only by the study of their possible interactions with other factors will an adequate causal explanation of depression be achieved. The usefulness of this as a validation of the concept of depression is emphasized. In this paper we shall firstly look at how concepts of depression affect the process of arriving at a diagnosis and secondly at policies of case finding. We are then in a position to survey critically the findings of epidemiology in the study of depression. Finally, we will review work which throws light on the social causation of depression with the emphasis on recent developments.
本文对抑郁症的概念进行了综述。抑郁症被定义为一种综合征,因此诊断过程尤其涉及诊断医生的主观判断。文中概述了由此产生的概念性难题。利用对已治疗病例的研究和社区访谈调查对风险率进行了综述。对已治疗病例率的研究更多地揭示了影响申报过程的变量,而非抑郁症本身。有人提出,病例发现的前提是使用标准化工具进行精确的病例定义。只有这样才能实现可比性。分析了社会人口统计学变量对风险率的影响:得出的结论是,它们对差异的解释作用不大,因为它们充其量只是粗略的衡量标准。评估了生活事件的作用,并认为只有通过研究它们与其他因素可能的相互作用,才能对抑郁症作出充分的因果解释。强调了这一点作为抑郁症概念验证的有用性。在本文中,我们首先将探讨抑郁症的概念如何影响诊断过程,其次将探讨病例发现政策。然后,我们将能够批判性地审视抑郁症研究中的流行病学发现。最后,我们将回顾一些揭示抑郁症社会成因的研究工作,重点是近期的进展。